Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
New Danley sub
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 32970" data-attributes="member: 30"><p>Re: New Danley sub</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The option allows for a number of different configuration in usage-each of which has its own advantages and disadvantages.</p><p></p><p>With the castor board on the back and the "front" panel removed (the front is the side that is 22.5x45"), it allows for normal stacking of subs. So the sub would be 45" wide and 22.5" tall and 60" deep.</p><p></p><p>The 60" deep may present a problem for a lot of venues-such as dance clubs-places with not much room to put subs and so forth. So if you move the exit to the "side" where the "exit side" of the cabinet is now 60x45" a lot of opportunities open up.</p><p></p><p>For example the cabinet is now only 22.5" deep. You can put that up against a wall and not stick out very far.</p><p></p><p>You can put tow of them together in a line with the mouths together in the middle. This will give you a 120" wide 60" high boundary with a single exit in the middle.</p><p></p><p>This will give a good bit of boundary loading-so the SPL would be louder than if you just stacked the 2 cabinets.</p><p></p><p>OR you could flip the configuration when flying so you have a 120" tall x 45" wide sub with the exits on the ends. This will give you a "donut shape" polar pattern that would put more energy towards the people in the rear, so you have a more even SPL coverage (id not killing the people in front). The large size of the boundary will offer some rejection towards the rear.</p><p></p><p>Or you can do a modified version of the exit in the middle 120" wide and make a V out of it. The mouths would be at the point of the V.</p><p></p><p>This does a couple of things-especially if you put a "top" on the V (ie opposite the floor), you will extend the low freq response (due to a now longer horn path), gain SPL (due to a narrowing of the "pattern" 90°vs180°).</p><p></p><p>If you went to 4 cabinets in the V (2 stacks of 2), you would have a very serious output configuration.</p><p></p><p>It is not a matter of which one is better-but which one is better for a particular situation. We just thought we would give several options in the same cabinet to offer more flexability.</p><p></p><p>This is also like our TH212, which offers the same sort of different configurations-and our DT20 and the DTS10. So it is nothing new in the idea-but due to the physical size of this cabinet-the additional boundaries offer a lot-if needed.</p><p></p><p>Just like the "barn doors" that people used to put on subs decades ago for more level and directivity. The ancients keep stealing our inventions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 32970, member: 30"] Re: New Danley sub The option allows for a number of different configuration in usage-each of which has its own advantages and disadvantages. With the castor board on the back and the "front" panel removed (the front is the side that is 22.5x45"), it allows for normal stacking of subs. So the sub would be 45" wide and 22.5" tall and 60" deep. The 60" deep may present a problem for a lot of venues-such as dance clubs-places with not much room to put subs and so forth. So if you move the exit to the "side" where the "exit side" of the cabinet is now 60x45" a lot of opportunities open up. For example the cabinet is now only 22.5" deep. You can put that up against a wall and not stick out very far. You can put tow of them together in a line with the mouths together in the middle. This will give you a 120" wide 60" high boundary with a single exit in the middle. This will give a good bit of boundary loading-so the SPL would be louder than if you just stacked the 2 cabinets. OR you could flip the configuration when flying so you have a 120" tall x 45" wide sub with the exits on the ends. This will give you a "donut shape" polar pattern that would put more energy towards the people in the rear, so you have a more even SPL coverage (id not killing the people in front). The large size of the boundary will offer some rejection towards the rear. Or you can do a modified version of the exit in the middle 120" wide and make a V out of it. The mouths would be at the point of the V. This does a couple of things-especially if you put a "top" on the V (ie opposite the floor), you will extend the low freq response (due to a now longer horn path), gain SPL (due to a narrowing of the "pattern" 90°vs180°). If you went to 4 cabinets in the V (2 stacks of 2), you would have a very serious output configuration. It is not a matter of which one is better-but which one is better for a particular situation. We just thought we would give several options in the same cabinet to offer more flexability. This is also like our TH212, which offers the same sort of different configurations-and our DT20 and the DTS10. So it is nothing new in the idea-but due to the physical size of this cabinet-the additional boundaries offer a lot-if needed. Just like the "barn doors" that people used to put on subs decades ago for more level and directivity. The ancients keep stealing our inventions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
New Danley sub
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!