Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
New DIY Mid High (90deg) - AKA PM90
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark DeArman" data-source="post: 137292" data-attributes="member: 950"><p>Re: New DIY Mid High</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, we are using broad strokes here to describe some very nuanced things. I would agree with you in some examples and not in other. For example, the integration of DSP to control line array coverage, I would agree. The use of DSP to boost/flatten LF or HF response, use that higher number as the sensitivity, and only publish the processed response, I would not. Also, using PEQ to cut/boost huge resonance issues in drivers, so that they don't appear in the sensitivity measurement, but show up disproportionately at higher power levels... Anyway, I didn't want to keep what was supposed to be a compliment, going totally off topic.</p><p></p><p>P.S. Maybe I'm just biased as someone who makes transducers for living. It's not as if I don't use a DSP for everything, and I'm sure as hell not advocating passive networks as being somehow superior.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark DeArman, post: 137292, member: 950"] Re: New DIY Mid High Well, we are using broad strokes here to describe some very nuanced things. I would agree with you in some examples and not in other. For example, the integration of DSP to control line array coverage, I would agree. The use of DSP to boost/flatten LF or HF response, use that higher number as the sensitivity, and only publish the processed response, I would not. Also, using PEQ to cut/boost huge resonance issues in drivers, so that they don't appear in the sensitivity measurement, but show up disproportionately at higher power levels... Anyway, I didn't want to keep what was supposed to be a compliment, going totally off topic. P.S. Maybe I'm just biased as someone who makes transducers for living. It's not as if I don't use a DSP for everything, and I'm sure as hell not advocating passive networks as being somehow superior. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
New DIY Mid High (90deg) - AKA PM90
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!