Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ivan Beaver" data-source="post: 137705" data-attributes="member: 30">Re: New DIY Mid HighHere is a screen shot from the main stage at a pretty large EDM event&nbsp; (the ticket sales alone were something like 15Million US$).I know I put 300&#039; on the screen-but in retrospect I think it was more like 400&#039; away.The display also says internal mic-but I was using the studio six external mic-not sure what was going on there.There were 48 &quot;big name&quot; double 18&quot; subs and 88 line array cabinets flown and 40 line arrays for the delays (not counting front fills) provided by one the larger sound companies.&nbsp; I was well within the coverage of the delays-which were at FOH position.You can see the ratios of higher freq to sub levels.&nbsp; These were averages over time-maybe 30 seconds or so, I don&#039;t remember.&nbsp; I have some more captures I need to find.This gives an idea of the ratio of sub to top capability that I am talking about.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ivan Beaver, post: 137705, member: 30"] Re: New DIY Mid High Here is a screen shot from the main stage at a pretty large EDM event (the ticket sales alone were something like 15Million US$). I know I put 300' on the screen-but in retrospect I think it was more like 400' away. The display also says internal mic-but I was using the studio six external mic-not sure what was going on there. There were 48 "big name" double 18" subs and 88 line array cabinets flown and 40 line arrays for the delays (not counting front fills) provided by one the larger sound companies. I was well within the coverage of the delays-which were at FOH position. You can see the ratios of higher freq to sub levels. These were averages over time-maybe 30 seconds or so, I don't remember. I have some more captures I need to find. This gives an idea of the ratio of sub to top capability that I am talking about. [/QUOTE]

Verification