Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
New DIY Mid High (90deg) - AKA PM90
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Peter Morris" data-source="post: 205632" data-attributes="member: 652"><p>I think there are a couple of reasons why we don’t like the flat response we measure using Smaart or Systune - the environment and the measurement compromises we often make do not give us a “real” anechoic response especially with respect to the lower frequencies; some additional LF energy still tends get into the measurement. When we EQ it out, it sounds thin. In addition the distortion products of the compression driver tend to make it sound a little louder than it is … quantifying these is difficult.</p><p></p><p>You can use a half space measurement to see what the LF end is doing and then measure the box as far away as possible from any boundaries, and about 4m in the air for the mid and HF response. Then try and splice to two measurement together remembering the half space measurement is +6db at the same distance.</p><p></p><p>The only problem is loading this horn into half space tends to flatten its response a little (1 or 2 dB) compared to full space.</p><p></p><p>If you want to do a power measurement you should have look at Acoustic Power Labs stuff – that’s their approach, measure the power response of the speaker then use EQ so the power response matches a correction cure. A suitable correction curve will be something like + 8 dB at the low frequency end relative to about 2K – 3K and flat- ish there after depending of the directivity of the speaker.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day I aim for a smooth response and “voice” the speaker with a little LF boost so that it sound natural to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Peter Morris, post: 205632, member: 652"] I think there are a couple of reasons why we don’t like the flat response we measure using Smaart or Systune - the environment and the measurement compromises we often make do not give us a “real” anechoic response especially with respect to the lower frequencies; some additional LF energy still tends get into the measurement. When we EQ it out, it sounds thin. In addition the distortion products of the compression driver tend to make it sound a little louder than it is … quantifying these is difficult. You can use a half space measurement to see what the LF end is doing and then measure the box as far away as possible from any boundaries, and about 4m in the air for the mid and HF response. Then try and splice to two measurement together remembering the half space measurement is +6db at the same distance. The only problem is loading this horn into half space tends to flatten its response a little (1 or 2 dB) compared to full space. If you want to do a power measurement you should have look at Acoustic Power Labs stuff – that’s their approach, measure the power response of the speaker then use EQ so the power response matches a correction cure. A suitable correction curve will be something like + 8 dB at the low frequency end relative to about 2K – 3K and flat- ish there after depending of the directivity of the speaker. At the end of the day I aim for a smooth response and “voice” the speaker with a little LF boost so that it sound natural to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
New DIY Mid High (90deg) - AKA PM90
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!