Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TJ Cornish" data-source="post: 32407" data-attributes="member: 162">Re: New ForumsAgreed - I still have a little &quot;gruntle&quot; left for the old place since I&#039;ve learned so much there over 8 years or so, but with things missing and/or broken and the fact that the majority of folks I want to talk to are here, this is where most of my content has ended up these last few months.&nbsp; I don&#039;t want ProSoundWeb to &quot;lose&quot; or necessarily Soundforums.net to &quot;win&quot; - what we had before the switchover wasn&#039;t really broken (at least as far as most end users saw - I understand there were admin and cost issues), and I hope for a thriving community with enough critical mass to be engaging.I like the pay to play model - another forum I&#039;m on - Sawmillcreek.org charges a $6/yr membership, and most users pay that fee, since there&#039;s a lot of positive peer pressure to do so, as well as some giveaways and contests only open to &quot;contributors&quot;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TJ Cornish, post: 32407, member: 162"] Re: New Forums Agreed - I still have a little "gruntle" left for the old place since I've learned so much there over 8 years or so, but with things missing and/or broken and the fact that the majority of folks I want to talk to are here, this is where most of my content has ended up these last few months. I don't want ProSoundWeb to "lose" or necessarily Soundforums.net to "win" - what we had before the switchover wasn't really broken (at least as far as most end users saw - I understand there were admin and cost issues), and I hope for a thriving community with enough critical mass to be engaging. I like the pay to play model - another forum I'm on - Sawmillcreek.org charges a $6/yr membership, and most users pay that fee, since there's a lot of positive peer pressure to do so, as well as some giveaways and contests only open to "contributors". [/QUOTE]

Verification