Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arik Semagin" data-source="post: 115148" data-attributes="member: 5072">Re: New Midas M32 ConsoleThat would be interesting to see, since Behringer didn&#039;t reserved a space for future expansion card that could&#039;ve add more AES50 ports, like Presonus did with new SL mixers release (AI).&nbsp; I don&#039;t mind running two AES50 CAT5 cables (Digi Profile also requires a separate snake for each&nbsp; stage rack). But instead of making a new DL1696 box, I&#039;d rather see DL2496, hoping for the future channel count upgrade, then we can fully utilize each AES50 cable capacity.May be Behringer can find some workaround by using Ultranet for signal transfers between two DL16, like they did for Turbosound speakers, or even USB ports, since distance is not an issue, they are usually on top of each other. I mean running two AES50 between M32 and first DL16, and use USB between first and second DL16s.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arik Semagin, post: 115148, member: 5072"] Re: New Midas M32 Console That would be interesting to see, since Behringer didn't reserved a space for future expansion card that could've add more AES50 ports, like Presonus did with new SL mixers release (AI). I don't mind running two AES50 CAT5 cables (Digi Profile also requires a separate snake for each stage rack). But instead of making a new DL1696 box, I'd rather see DL2496, hoping for the future channel count upgrade, then we can fully utilize each AES50 cable capacity. May be Behringer can find some workaround by using Ultranet for signal transfers between two DL16, like they did for Turbosound speakers, or even USB ports, since distance is not an issue, they are usually on top of each other. I mean running two AES50 between M32 and first DL16, and use USB between first and second DL16s. [/QUOTE]

Verification