Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scott Bolt" data-source="post: 129798" data-attributes="member: 3950">Re: New Midas M32 ConsoleThanks Mike,For what it is worth, in a live environment, it seems hard to imagine any sonic difference between 48Khz and 96Khz since even 48Khz can produce artifact free 24Khz signal .... which is well beyond human hearing range (and an even farther way beyond my current hearing <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).I would agree that in a pro environment, workflow is paramount.Also, while the A/D and D/A converters on the M32 are easily capable of sampling at 192Khz (needed for 96Khz processing), I am not certain that the existing X32 SHARC processors can handle this at full load.&nbsp; My thought was that Music Group might be able to do an upgrade from their SHARC 3 TO SHARC 4 if they socketed the DSP chips.&nbsp; From what I have been able to read, the two families are code compatible, but the 4 has significantly more processing capabilities.&nbsp; I would be very interested if someone could take a look under the hood and snap some pictures <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scott Bolt, post: 129798, member: 3950"] Re: New Midas M32 Console Thanks Mike, For what it is worth, in a live environment, it seems hard to imagine any sonic difference between 48Khz and 96Khz since even 48Khz can produce artifact free 24Khz signal .... which is well beyond human hearing range (and an even farther way beyond my current hearing ;) ). I would agree that in a pro environment, workflow is paramount. Also, while the A/D and D/A converters on the M32 are easily capable of sampling at 192Khz (needed for 96Khz processing), I am not certain that the existing X32 SHARC processors can handle this at full load. My thought was that Music Group might be able to do an upgrade from their SHARC 3 TO SHARC 4 if they socketed the DSP chips. From what I have been able to read, the two families are code compatible, but the 4 has significantly more processing capabilities. I would be very interested if someone could take a look under the hood and snap some pictures ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification