Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Per SÃ¸vik" data-source="post: 131195" data-attributes="member: 1285">Re: Test results from PP mag are outSo Jan finally confirmed it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />~<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :-)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />~:smile:There are forum members at other forums that claim they have spoken to developers at Midas in England, being told stories about Midas developing the X32, giving it to Behringer and then making an upgraded version with more processing power, the M32. :lol:I think I saw a claim somewhere that the M32 sounded better even when both were using a 251 stagebox or both processing digital stuff off a computer.X32 getting bogged down? Nobody ever made that claim until now, but that doesn&#039;t stop people having the perception that screen-changes are smoother along with all else that is perceived as &quot;better&quot; just because the console looks good and the faders might move smoother. &quot;If it looks better it is better&quot; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />~;-)~:wink:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Per SÃ¸vik, post: 131195, member: 1285"] Re: Test results from PP mag are out So Jan finally confirmed it :)~:-)~:smile: There are forum members at other forums that claim they have spoken to developers at Midas in England, being told stories about Midas developing the X32, giving it to Behringer and then making an upgraded version with more processing power, the M32. :lol: I think I saw a claim somewhere that the M32 sounded better even when both were using a 251 stagebox or both processing digital stuff off a computer. X32 getting bogged down? Nobody ever made that claim until now, but that doesn't stop people having the perception that screen-changes are smoother along with all else that is perceived as "better" just because the console looks good and the faders might move smoother. "If it looks better it is better" ;)~;-)~:wink: [/QUOTE]

Verification