Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
No compromises front loaded double 18” cab
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Simon Coffin" data-source="post: 132532" data-attributes="member: 388"><p>Re: No compromises front loaded double 18” cab</p><p></p><p>Hey Luke,</p><p></p><p>Nice work on the build.</p><p></p><p>I'm curious about the port design. Based on the link posted earlier in this thread that related aerodynamic theory and especially boundary layer friction to high power port design, your port with the different cross sections top, middle and bottom may not behave consistently. Since the boundary layer is going to affect the narrow center section of the port much more so than the top and bottom, I wonder if the ports effective tuning is going to shift upwards with power. Probably all ports exhibit a change in effective tuning at different air velocities, but this design may exaggerate that behavior.</p><p></p><p>I'm curious what your testing reveals, but a pencil sketch on napkin application of the theory indicates the best port cross section for a high power application is a circle, as it has the least surface area for a given internal area.</p><p></p><p>In either case, nice woodworking. Let us know how they perform.</p><p></p><p>Ciao</p><p>Simon</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Simon Coffin, post: 132532, member: 388"] Re: No compromises front loaded double 18” cab Hey Luke, Nice work on the build. I'm curious about the port design. Based on the link posted earlier in this thread that related aerodynamic theory and especially boundary layer friction to high power port design, your port with the different cross sections top, middle and bottom may not behave consistently. Since the boundary layer is going to affect the narrow center section of the port much more so than the top and bottom, I wonder if the ports effective tuning is going to shift upwards with power. Probably all ports exhibit a change in effective tuning at different air velocities, but this design may exaggerate that behavior. I'm curious what your testing reveals, but a pencil sketch on napkin application of the theory indicates the best port cross section for a high power application is a circle, as it has the least surface area for a given internal area. In either case, nice woodworking. Let us know how they perform. Ciao Simon [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
DIY Audio
No compromises front loaded double 18” cab
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!