Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Not that anyone needed proof...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 74807" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Not that anyone needed proof...</p><p></p><p><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> Caveat emptor bayy-bee.</p><p></p><p>I recall bench testing a European competitor's powered mixer that my reps claimed had superior sound quality and was killing us at POS in stores in Europe. When the EQ was set flat, it had a dB or two of bass boost. It turns out they had (innocently?) used knobs who's cores were designed for vertical orientation but used on a horizontal layout (i.e. when set flat they were not centered). If the customers (and apparently my reps) think that is a better design, that's just serendipity. I suspect if the flat position was dialing in a few dB of bass cut, that innocent mistake would not have been accepted by the company. </p><p></p><p>I don't believe in innocent mistakes, I have seen a number of similar design oversights that lead causal listeners (like at POS) to draw incorrect conclusions. But that's life in the trenches... I informed my reps but who knows how many dealers and customers believed the nonsense (apparently a bunch). I won't bore you with a long list.</p><p></p><p>JR</p><p></p><p>PS: I recall a very painful product transition for a high volume popular powered head, where we changed the gain pot law for better kill when turned down but it inadvertently ended up with a couple dB less gain at 12 o"clock... Dealers and customers thought the new version had less power. We finally gave up arguing with the marketplace that the two heads had the same power (it was actually the same exact amp module). We tooled up a new pot with a gain taper that delivered similar gain at the defacto 12 o'clock operating standard, so the new unit agreed with the old one, and the market finally accepted that the new amp had the same power. Silly but true story, perception is reality for the marketplace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 74807, member: 126"] Re: Not that anyone needed proof... :-) :-) Caveat emptor bayy-bee. I recall bench testing a European competitor's powered mixer that my reps claimed had superior sound quality and was killing us at POS in stores in Europe. When the EQ was set flat, it had a dB or two of bass boost. It turns out they had (innocently?) used knobs who's cores were designed for vertical orientation but used on a horizontal layout (i.e. when set flat they were not centered). If the customers (and apparently my reps) think that is a better design, that's just serendipity. I suspect if the flat position was dialing in a few dB of bass cut, that innocent mistake would not have been accepted by the company. I don't believe in innocent mistakes, I have seen a number of similar design oversights that lead causal listeners (like at POS) to draw incorrect conclusions. But that's life in the trenches... I informed my reps but who knows how many dealers and customers believed the nonsense (apparently a bunch). I won't bore you with a long list. JR PS: I recall a very painful product transition for a high volume popular powered head, where we changed the gain pot law for better kill when turned down but it inadvertently ended up with a couple dB less gain at 12 o"clock... Dealers and customers thought the new version had less power. We finally gave up arguing with the marketplace that the two heads had the same power (it was actually the same exact amp module). We tooled up a new pot with a gain taper that delivered similar gain at the defacto 12 o'clock operating standard, so the new unit agreed with the old one, and the market finally accepted that the new amp had the same power. Silly but true story, perception is reality for the marketplace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Not that anyone needed proof...
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!