Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Not that anyone needed proof...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 74817" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Not that anyone needed proof...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have mentioned this before, control laws are part of the ergonomic design that can change the perception of otherwise similar measuring audio paths. In EQs there is another variable (Q), but that is another story. Conservative design is to make the EQ slow around "0dB" , so it is actually flat when you tell it to be flat, a fast off zero EQ can be interpreted as having more boost/cut than a slower off "0" design but look bad in benchmark flat measurements, if not zero'd while looking at the result. Surely not how the operator uses it. I like my EQ to reflect what the knob tells me as accurately as practical. :-(</p><p></p><p>Another consideration is to do no harm, i.e. do not give the operator so much boost/cut that they can make their path sound bad. I once encouraged the project engineer on a premium mic preamp with simple shelving EQ, to limit that to only +/-6 dB, the better to not sound bad, no matter how hard the customer tried (it worked IMO). </p><p></p><p>Console ergonomics is one of the subtle reasons some consoles just work and sound better than others.. i wish I had a PHd in this high art, but I have only been studying it for decades. I believe I have an above average grasp tho... </p><p></p><p>JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 74817, member: 126"] Re: Not that anyone needed proof... I have mentioned this before, control laws are part of the ergonomic design that can change the perception of otherwise similar measuring audio paths. In EQs there is another variable (Q), but that is another story. Conservative design is to make the EQ slow around "0dB" , so it is actually flat when you tell it to be flat, a fast off zero EQ can be interpreted as having more boost/cut than a slower off "0" design but look bad in benchmark flat measurements, if not zero'd while looking at the result. Surely not how the operator uses it. I like my EQ to reflect what the knob tells me as accurately as practical. :-( Another consideration is to do no harm, i.e. do not give the operator so much boost/cut that they can make their path sound bad. I once encouraged the project engineer on a premium mic preamp with simple shelving EQ, to limit that to only +/-6 dB, the better to not sound bad, no matter how hard the customer tried (it worked IMO). Console ergonomics is one of the subtle reasons some consoles just work and sound better than others.. i wish I had a PHd in this high art, but I have only been studying it for decades. I believe I have an above average grasp tho... JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Not that anyone needed proof...
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!