Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brian jojade" data-source="post: 43568" data-attributes="member: 211">Re: &#039;Nother Mac Inquiry...Parallels and VMWare Fusion are pretty comparable.&nbsp; They tend to leapfrog each other as new versions are released.&nbsp; Both are solid products.&nbsp; I prefer Parallels, personally simply because I have gotten better support from them for installs.&nbsp; We&#039;ve installed hundreds of systems and for the most part, it&#039;s gone wonderfully.&nbsp; Most of the issues were Windows related problems to start with.Using the free open source software is also an option.&nbsp; However, that software tends to be a bit less polished.&nbsp; If you&#039;re savvy, you can get it to work.&nbsp; Using the packaged products makes it dead simple.edit: perfect timing.&nbsp; Just ran across this article on MacWorld.<a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/164817/2012/01/the_best_way_to_run_windows_on_your_mac.html" target="_blank">http://www.macworld.com/article/164817/2012/01/the_best_way_to_run_windows_on_your_mac.html</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brian jojade, post: 43568, member: 211"] Re: 'Nother Mac Inquiry... Parallels and VMWare Fusion are pretty comparable. They tend to leapfrog each other as new versions are released. Both are solid products. I prefer Parallels, personally simply because I have gotten better support from them for installs. We've installed hundreds of systems and for the most part, it's gone wonderfully. Most of the issues were Windows related problems to start with. Using the free open source software is also an option. However, that software tends to be a bit less polished. If you're savvy, you can get it to work. Using the packaged products makes it dead simple. edit: perfect timing. Just ran across this article on MacWorld. [url]http://www.macworld.com/article/164817/2012/01/the_best_way_to_run_windows_on_your_mac.html[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification