Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Obligatory Grammy audio complaint thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lee Brenkman" data-source="post: 19220" data-attributes="member: 154"><p>Re: Obligatory Grammy audio complaint thread</p><p></p><p>FWIW they (the Cossette company) who produce the show for television have decided that, for the sake of ratings, it's better to have a lot of multi "artist" special performances rather than hand out a lot of awards on the air. This year I think they only handed out about 10 to 12 Grammys on the "big show".</p><p></p><p>Everything else, including a lot of categories that used to be given out on the network broadcast was announced at the pre show which is only available on line.</p><p></p><p>I think that the current leadership of the Recording Academy feels that the broadcast is now mostly "face time" and the better the ratings the more $ they get to fund all of the actually good things they do throughout the country the rest of the year.</p><p></p><p>I've been a voting NARAS member since the 1980s and the changes in that time have been massive. I actually served three terms on the SF Chapter Board of Governors and the reports we got back from our representative on the broadcast committee were, even then, pretty discouraging. At least then the battle lost was that Kenny G got to be the "jazz" representative on the show instead of Oscar Peterson. Now everyone I care about who's nominate gets to go and sit in the arena while the spectacle unfolds but the REAL awards show goes on earlier in the afternoon and unseen by the general public.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lee Brenkman, post: 19220, member: 154"] Re: Obligatory Grammy audio complaint thread FWIW they (the Cossette company) who produce the show for television have decided that, for the sake of ratings, it's better to have a lot of multi "artist" special performances rather than hand out a lot of awards on the air. This year I think they only handed out about 10 to 12 Grammys on the "big show". Everything else, including a lot of categories that used to be given out on the network broadcast was announced at the pre show which is only available on line. I think that the current leadership of the Recording Academy feels that the broadcast is now mostly "face time" and the better the ratings the more $ they get to fund all of the actually good things they do throughout the country the rest of the year. I've been a voting NARAS member since the 1980s and the changes in that time have been massive. I actually served three terms on the SF Chapter Board of Governors and the reports we got back from our representative on the broadcast committee were, even then, pretty discouraging. At least then the battle lost was that Kenny G got to be the "jazz" representative on the show instead of Oscar Peterson. Now everyone I care about who's nominate gets to go and sit in the arena while the spectacle unfolds but the REAL awards show goes on earlier in the afternoon and unseen by the general public. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
Obligatory Grammy audio complaint thread
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!