Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Opinions on limiting for speaker protection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 132443" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Opinions on limiting for speaker protection</p><p></p><p></p><p>"Limiter" or more accurately voltage limiters are fairly crude forms of protection. Ideally we should measure, model, or impute voice coil temperature and manage that to avoid failure or even avoid power compression which occurs before thermal failure. Likewise DSP can estimate or predict excursion from the audio waveform and reduce gain if needed to thwart that. </p><p></p><p>So yes my opinion is that smart speaker protection is useful. </p><p></p><p>Speaker protection is about the speakers, not the gig (or amp), so when set to protect the drivers it should not need to be changed ever. </p><p></p><p></p><p>If you rarely lose drivers in 30 years maybe you don't need to change anything, unless you already changed something like amps or boxes. </p><p></p><p>My personal preference is for the speaker design engineers to dial in the protection and to do that well involves powered speakers where the design engineers have access to more data and full system control. A close second is something like the protection circuitry that is built into the drivers (DFEND?) but that is more expensive than the whole system approach of a powered cabinet. </p><p></p><p> JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 132443, member: 126"] Re: Opinions on limiting for speaker protection "Limiter" or more accurately voltage limiters are fairly crude forms of protection. Ideally we should measure, model, or impute voice coil temperature and manage that to avoid failure or even avoid power compression which occurs before thermal failure. Likewise DSP can estimate or predict excursion from the audio waveform and reduce gain if needed to thwart that. So yes my opinion is that smart speaker protection is useful. Speaker protection is about the speakers, not the gig (or amp), so when set to protect the drivers it should not need to be changed ever. If you rarely lose drivers in 30 years maybe you don't need to change anything, unless you already changed something like amps or boxes. My personal preference is for the speaker design engineers to dial in the protection and to do that well involves powered speakers where the design engineers have access to more data and full system control. A close second is something like the protection circuitry that is built into the drivers (DFEND?) but that is more expensive than the whole system approach of a powered cabinet. JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Opinions on limiting for speaker protection
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!