Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Overheads: small vs LARGE condenser
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jim McKeveny" data-source="post: 122744" data-attributes="member: 2978"><p>Re: Overheads: small vs LARGE condenser</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like the L'Acoustics KUDO, I think Meyer wishes the M2D would just go away. Too many compromises, and perhaps rushed to market.</p><p></p><p>I hate onstage clutter, so a single OH is my choice. It is only for "sheen" if needed. Coherency is out the window. </p><p></p><p>Lots of artists' engineers are archiving these days, so I see lots of Shure VP88's on OH's. If the split to record is "raw off the floor", there is lots of future correction/sweetening possible.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jim McKeveny, post: 122744, member: 2978"] Re: Overheads: small vs LARGE condenser Like the L'Acoustics KUDO, I think Meyer wishes the M2D would just go away. Too many compromises, and perhaps rushed to market. I hate onstage clutter, so a single OH is my choice. It is only for "sheen" if needed. Coherency is out the window. Lots of artists' engineers are archiving these days, so I see lots of Shure VP88's on OH's. If the split to record is "raw off the floor", there is lots of future correction/sweetening possible. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Overheads: small vs LARGE condenser
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
