Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
PK Sound
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tim Duffin" data-source="post: 84377" data-attributes="member: 400"><p>Re: PK Sound</p><p></p><p>Well, here is an example: Though not a true spec sheet. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.jblpro.com/BackOffice/ProductAttachments/SSASB7118.0609.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.jblpro.com/BackOffice/ProductAttachments/SSASB7118.0609.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>It says that the cone is capable of 89mm of excursion. Which, if true beats everything else out there because it is way more efficient at low freqs. The TC sounds product looks great on paper, but is so inefficient you will never get near its claimed excursion because it simply does not move. </p><p></p><p>I consider the Best B&C to be the: <a href="http://www.bcspeakers.com/products/lf-driver-neo/18-0/18nw100" target="_blank">B&C Speakers</a></p><p></p><p>and the best faital to be: <a href="http://www.faitalpro.com/products/LF_Loudspeakers/product_details/index.php?id=201070140" target="_blank">FaitalPRO | LF Loudspeakers | 18XL1600</a></p><p></p><p>Both of them are not as loud or efficient at low frequencies, in all circumstances I have tested. </p><p></p><p>BTW-- I don't consider testing subs at 3 watts and 1000Hz for 1 minute a valid test. I only want to know what the sub sounds like with 3x RMS for 8 hours playing 50hz and getting so hot you can't touch it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tim Duffin, post: 84377, member: 400"] Re: PK Sound Well, here is an example: Though not a true spec sheet. [url]http://www.jblpro.com/BackOffice/ProductAttachments/SSASB7118.0609.pdf[/url] It says that the cone is capable of 89mm of excursion. Which, if true beats everything else out there because it is way more efficient at low freqs. The TC sounds product looks great on paper, but is so inefficient you will never get near its claimed excursion because it simply does not move. I consider the Best B&C to be the: [url=http://www.bcspeakers.com/products/lf-driver-neo/18-0/18nw100]B&C Speakers[/url] and the best faital to be: [url=http://www.faitalpro.com/products/LF_Loudspeakers/product_details/index.php?id=201070140]FaitalPRO | LF Loudspeakers | 18XL1600[/url] Both of them are not as loud or efficient at low frequencies, in all circumstances I have tested. BTW-- I don't consider testing subs at 3 watts and 1000Hz for 1 minute a valid test. I only want to know what the sub sounds like with 3x RMS for 8 hours playing 50hz and getting so hot you can't touch it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
PK Sound
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!