Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Klaus Mock" data-source="post: 83092" data-attributes="member: 2891">Re: Presonus 32.4.2AlFirst, most arguments pro SL are something like &#039;coming from analog desks its easier&#039;. In fact this argument is not a real one because normally it needs a few hours to get familiar with the concepts of a digital console. Imho it is more complex to deal with all the routing and usabilty issues of analog consoles and the needed outboard gear then using a digital desk.Second, a big disadvantage of the SL series is the fact, that the less input channels the less processing parameters and features you get. Other vendors, e.g. Yamaha or Soundcraft, are providing the same features except the number of inputs and outputs.Behringer goes even one step further and allows you to have the same engine and IO capabilities for the whole range. (Except the IX16). Only the control surface and local io differs. But the eq, dynamics , busses and so on are the same for the whole range.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Klaus Mock, post: 83092, member: 2891"] Re: Presonus 32.4.2Al First, most arguments pro SL are something like 'coming from analog desks its easier'. In fact this argument is not a real one because normally it needs a few hours to get familiar with the concepts of a digital console. Imho it is more complex to deal with all the routing and usabilty issues of analog consoles and the needed outboard gear then using a digital desk. Second, a big disadvantage of the SL series is the fact, that the less input channels the less processing parameters and features you get. Other vendors, e.g. Yamaha or Soundcraft, are providing the same features except the number of inputs and outputs. Behringer goes even one step further and allows you to have the same engine and IO capabilities for the whole range. (Except the IX16). Only the control surface and local io differs. But the eq, dynamics , busses and so on are the same for the whole range. [/QUOTE]

Verification