Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Scott Bolt" data-source="post: 107597" data-attributes="member: 3950">Re: Presonus Shady Marketing ActivitiesSean, I believe you meant the DL1608 <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp; Perhaps a Freudian slip?I agree with your assessment..... although it is difficult for me to understand what Mackie was thinking when they didn&#039;t make the head amps recall-able.I think that Presonus 16.4.2 is going to face competition from below in the &lt;$1000.00 mixers like the DL1608, and iX16 (iPad mixers).&nbsp; From above, they are up against digilog mixers like the Expression Si, X32 Producer, and Qu-16.&nbsp; Both the 24 and 32 AI are going to be pressed by the X32 and Expression Si.There are precious few use cases where one would decide to purchase a StudioLive (I think the 16.0.2 still has a niche though).Perhaps all they have left is misleading marketing material?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Scott Bolt, post: 107597, member: 3950"] Re: Presonus Shady Marketing Activities Sean, I believe you meant the DL1608 ;) Perhaps a Freudian slip? I agree with your assessment..... although it is difficult for me to understand what Mackie was thinking when they didn't make the head amps recall-able. I think that Presonus 16.4.2 is going to face competition from below in the <$1000.00 mixers like the DL1608, and iX16 (iPad mixers). From above, they are up against digilog mixers like the Expression Si, X32 Producer, and Qu-16. Both the 24 and 32 AI are going to be pressed by the X32 and Expression Si. There are precious few use cases where one would decide to purchase a StudioLive (I think the 16.0.2 still has a niche though). Perhaps all they have left is misleading marketing material? [/QUOTE]

Verification