Reply to thread

Message

Re: QSC K12 and KSub

Ian,

I cannot speak to the KW series, only the plastic k boxes. I've never used the KW. I don't mean for anyone to take umbrage at my opinion, and I am not sure how to reply to the rest of your message in a way that is helpful to the thread. I could trumpet opinions of others whose ears I trust, but ultimately it is a "he said she said" that benefits no one.

I think most of us here have done SOS gigs on gear they thought was lackluster, and SOS have always been more about roi than sound anyways. Almost every pa company I've ever interacted with has SOS and RF as their busiest pieces of inventory.

In Justice's case, he is about to spend his state upgrade allotment on product he hopes will exceed his old mackie(rcf) inventory. I'm merely commenting that he is unlikely to experience an improvement in subjective sound quality at the hands of the k series vs. RCF era SRM450. You'll notice that I in no way discouraged him from the purchase, but want to help him spend the states money wisely. Upgrading working kit with product of equivalent performance may not be the best way for him to spend his sparse dollars.

<blockquote data-quote="Phil Graham" data-source="post: 32712" data-attributes="member: 430">Re: QSC K12 and KSubIan,I cannot speak to the KW series, only the plastic k boxes. I&#039;ve never used the KW. I don&#039;t mean for anyone to take umbrage at my opinion, and I am not sure how to reply to the rest of your message in a way that is helpful to the thread. I could trumpet opinions of others whose ears I trust, but ultimately it is a &quot;he said she said&quot; that benefits no one.I think most of us here have done SOS gigs on gear they thought was lackluster, and SOS have always been more about roi than sound anyways. Almost every pa company I&#039;ve ever interacted with has SOS and RF as their busiest pieces of inventory.In Justice&#039;s case, he is about to spend his state upgrade allotment on product he hopes will exceed his old mackie(rcf) inventory. I&#039;m merely commenting that he is unlikely to experience an improvement in subjective sound quality at the hands of the k series vs. RCF era SRM450. You&#039;ll notice that I in no way discouraged him from the purchase, but want to help him spend the states money wisely. Upgrading working kit with product of equivalent performance may not be the best way for him to spend his sparse dollars.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Phil Graham, post: 32712, member: 430"] Re: QSC K12 and KSub Ian, I cannot speak to the KW series, only the plastic k boxes. I've never used the KW. I don't mean for anyone to take umbrage at my opinion, and I am not sure how to reply to the rest of your message in a way that is helpful to the thread. I could trumpet opinions of others whose ears I trust, but ultimately it is a "he said she said" that benefits no one. I think most of us here have done SOS gigs on gear they thought was lackluster, and SOS have always been more about roi than sound anyways. Almost every pa company I've ever interacted with has SOS and RF as their busiest pieces of inventory. In Justice's case, he is about to spend his state upgrade allotment on product he hopes will exceed his old mackie(rcf) inventory. I'm merely commenting that he is unlikely to experience an improvement in subjective sound quality at the hands of the k series vs. RCF era SRM450. You'll notice that I in no way discouraged him from the purchase, but want to help him spend the states money wisely. Upgrading working kit with product of equivalent performance may not be the best way for him to spend his sparse dollars. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Top Bottom