Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Recommendations for mid-level wireless?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brian Bolly" data-source="post: 216816" data-attributes="member: 32"><p>Hi Tom,</p><p></p><p>As the EW-D series is relatively new (about a year) I have not run into it yet. Sennheiser was rather late to the game for a digital wireless system that wasn't their flagship series — the Shure ULX-D system has been out for 10 years now, and the QLX-D is functionally identical in terms of RF performance. That said, the difference I see between the QLX-D and EW-D are:</p><p></p><p>- Tuning bandwidth - QLX-D is 64 MHz per band; EW-D is 56 MHz</p><p>- Transmit power - QLX-D is switchable 1mW/10mW; EW-D is 10 mW fixed</p><p>- Monitoring - Shure via Network/Wireless Workbench software; Sennheiser via App/BLE</p><p>- Updating - Shure via Network/Shure Update Utility; Sennheiser via App/BLE</p><p>- Battery - Shure rechargeable batteries monitor charge cycles, battery health; Sennheiser do not appear to</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, if you are comfortable with BLE as a communication protocol and the Sennheiser fits your budget, that may be your ticket. The QLX-D offers a bit more flexibility, which is on par with the price point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brian Bolly, post: 216816, member: 32"] Hi Tom, As the EW-D series is relatively new (about a year) I have not run into it yet. Sennheiser was rather late to the game for a digital wireless system that wasn't their flagship series — the Shure ULX-D system has been out for 10 years now, and the QLX-D is functionally identical in terms of RF performance. That said, the difference I see between the QLX-D and EW-D are: - Tuning bandwidth - QLX-D is 64 MHz per band; EW-D is 56 MHz - Transmit power - QLX-D is switchable 1mW/10mW; EW-D is 10 mW fixed - Monitoring - Shure via Network/Wireless Workbench software; Sennheiser via App/BLE - Updating - Shure via Network/Shure Update Utility; Sennheiser via App/BLE - Battery - Shure rechargeable batteries monitor charge cycles, battery health; Sennheiser do not appear to Ultimately, if you are comfortable with BLE as a communication protocol and the Sennheiser fits your budget, that may be your ticket. The QLX-D offers a bit more flexibility, which is on par with the price point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Recommendations for mid-level wireless?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!