Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Recommendations for mid-level wireless?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve Hurt" data-source="post: 216850" data-attributes="member: 311"><p>I'm using the EW-D and have used EW-100, EW300, and EW500</p><p>The EW-D sounds better than all of them. </p><p>It takes about 1 second to hear the difference.</p><p>no weird Sennheiser compansion</p><p>They are easier to use to (to set channels, scan, etc) </p><p>I see no negatives with the EW-D (other than Sennheisr makes less $) and I see a lot of positives.</p><p></p><p>If they would come out with EW-D IEM's, I'd sell all 7 of my transmitters and all 10 packs tomorrow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve Hurt, post: 216850, member: 311"] I'm using the EW-D and have used EW-100, EW300, and EW500 The EW-D sounds better than all of them. It takes about 1 second to hear the difference. no weird Sennheiser compansion They are easier to use to (to set channels, scan, etc) I see no negatives with the EW-D (other than Sennheisr makes less $) and I see a lot of positives. If they would come out with EW-D IEM's, I'd sell all 7 of my transmitters and all 10 packs tomorrow. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Recommendations for mid-level wireless?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!