Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Simon Coffin" data-source="post: 14114" data-attributes="member: 388">Folks,Thinking of possible paths for a monitor update later this summer.&nbsp; We have 8 Meyer UM-1C wedges with 4 of the M1-A processors.&nbsp; Getting all the drivers reconed is probably necessary and easy enough, but the processors are no longer made and hard to find on the used market.&nbsp; Meyer tech support indicates the M1-A uses analog phase and amplitude correction that cannot be replicated on a DSP, not even their own Galileo.&nbsp; Which means if I want to get more mixes we would have to find a way to translate the analog crossover to a DSP?Does anyone have any experience doing that?Alternately, we could buy all new wedges, but as is always the problem, the budget requires we stay in the used market.&nbsp; Whatever we get will need to be as rider friendly and sound as good as the Meyers.Thoughts?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Simon Coffin, post: 14114, member: 388"] Folks, Thinking of possible paths for a monitor update later this summer. We have 8 Meyer UM-1C wedges with 4 of the M1-A processors. Getting all the drivers reconed is probably necessary and easy enough, but the processors are no longer made and hard to find on the used market. Meyer tech support indicates the M1-A uses analog phase and amplitude correction that cannot be replicated on a DSP, not even their own Galileo. Which means if I want to get more mixes we would have to find a way to translate the analog crossover to a DSP? Does anyone have any experience doing that? Alternately, we could buy all new wedges, but as is always the problem, the budget requires we stay in the used market. Whatever we get will need to be as rider friendly and sound as good as the Meyers. Thoughts? [/QUOTE]

Verification