Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Per SÃ¸vik" data-source="post: 81143" data-attributes="member: 1285">Re: Scene Manager - Public Beta Release V 0.1.5It&#039;s called Obscure Sound Control for a reason <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />~;-)~:wink:If I was to put on my ranting shoes/gloves/hat or whatever is suitable for ranting, I would say that it is a violation of principle not to publish the whole implementation, ie. if parts are undocumented it is per definition not &quot;open&quot; and thus in violation of the principle behind. Not that a full documentation would help a lot in this case, since this particular quirk is more or less documented already.:twisted: One could of course come up with theories as to why things are structured the way they are, anything from Evil-Behringer to a programming team not communicating is plausible :twisted:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Per SÃ¸vik, post: 81143, member: 1285"] Re: Scene Manager - Public Beta Release V 0.1.5 It's called Obscure Sound Control for a reason ;)~;-)~:wink: If I was to put on my ranting shoes/gloves/hat or whatever is suitable for ranting, I would say that it is a violation of principle not to publish the whole implementation, ie. if parts are undocumented it is per definition not "open" and thus in violation of the principle behind. Not that a full documentation would help a lot in this case, since this particular quirk is more or less documented already. :twisted: One could of course come up with theories as to why things are structured the way they are, anything from Evil-Behringer to a programming team not communicating is plausible :twisted: [/QUOTE]

Verification