Normal
Re: SH-50 array eq.I can foresee a number of system owners, operators and end users screwing this up in ways we've yet to imagine.When l'Acoustic began what I thought of as a Don Quixote task - getting USA sound company owners and system engineers to embrace "black box" system controllers with non-alterable settings - I was very much in the camp of "screw them, I paid $400,000 for the rig and I'm entitled to use it any way I see fit." My understanding of the measurement, processing and deployment of line arrays was woefully ignorant and I have since come to understand much more.Any SH50 owner/user who thinks he is capable of making crossover-type adjustments probably isn't. I think they'd be better served with some "rules of thumb" regarding the use of LF shelving filters to reduce the LF buildup from coupling... and interestingly that's what most "array length compensation" does for line arrays.Just some thoughts...
Re: SH-50 array eq.
I can foresee a number of system owners, operators and end users screwing this up in ways we've yet to imagine.
When l'Acoustic began what I thought of as a Don Quixote task - getting USA sound company owners and system engineers to embrace "black box" system controllers with non-alterable settings - I was very much in the camp of "screw them, I paid $400,000 for the rig and I'm entitled to use it any way I see fit." My understanding of the measurement, processing and deployment of line arrays was woefully ignorant and I have since come to understand much more.
Any SH50 owner/user who thinks he is capable of making crossover-type adjustments probably isn't. I think they'd be better served with some "rules of thumb" regarding the use of LF shelving filters to reduce the LF buildup from coupling... and interestingly that's what most "array length compensation" does for line arrays.
Just some thoughts...