Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Sim VS Smaart
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merlijn van Veen" data-source="post: 92999" data-attributes="member: 4708"><p>Both analyzers use multiple FFT sizes to create the complete transfer function. AFAICT SMAART uses fewer FFTs over wider frequency bands in comparison to SIM. One could also say that SIM uses more but shorter time constants allowing less opportunity for reverbant energy and even echos. To me this makes SIM feel more "accurate". Like many of us however, due to the expensive price, I work happily with SMAART which is very user friendly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merlijn van Veen, post: 92999, member: 4708"] Both analyzers use multiple FFT sizes to create the complete transfer function. AFAICT SMAART uses fewer FFTs over wider frequency bands in comparison to SIM. One could also say that SIM uses more but shorter time constants allowing less opportunity for reverbant energy and even echos. To me this makes SIM feel more "accurate". Like many of us however, due to the expensive price, I work happily with SMAART which is very user friendly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Sim VS Smaart
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!