Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Sim VS Smaart
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Timo Beckman" data-source="post: 97855" data-attributes="member: 1173"><p>Re: Sim VS Smaart</p><p></p><p>@ helge do not know . Maybe 1 of the guy's from rational knows how to do this .</p><p></p><p>@ Matt I had the same problem with the Mid-highs in the first screenshot (big jumps just past 4K) . There's about 10 drivers in this 1 cabinet . </p><p>So if i get to close to it i'll see multiple drivers and jumps in the phase and magnitude screen . If i take more distance from the cab coherence is going to drop but the ratio in distance difference between the multiple drivers reduces and the phase is going to flatten out a bit more but it will get harder to make choices regarding x-over/allpass filters .</p><p> </p><p>Also this is a brand new product and this is a good start but not the final product . There was no foam(? sorry i'm from the Netherlands so sometimes my english fails me) on the inside of the cab so this still has to be done . We just needed to test this before moving forward . Specially the onax vs ofax was something we needed to know and it came out rather well (could be better but not bad at all for a first try).</p><p></p><p>To bad the intelli-x processor doesn't have elliptic filters up to now like the xta or Galileo has . They make the sound more natural (sorry can't put it in any other words) .</p><p></p><p>For the rest of it : it's a comparison of data between both analyzers which is not done at this time (still need to compare some other stuff but that's for another measurement session <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I had to do 3 more products after this 1 so i was happy to get this done and the 3 other measurements on 1 day .</p><p></p><p>@matt again the jumps are definitely multiple drivers </p><p>[ATTACH]152566[/ATTACH]</p><p>In the image above you see in the blue line a semi straight line from 315 to just past 500 a jump and than on to just before 1k and on it goes . I see this also if i'm to close to a line array in the low to mid frequency range where the response is going from omni to slightly directional until you get to the high drivers which are directional .</p><p>You can also see the same behavior a bit in the lower frequencies at the high mid section . I was pretty close to the cabinet . When i took a bit more difference it started to level out more and walking the room gave me a pretty good idea about this product .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Timo Beckman, post: 97855, member: 1173"] Re: Sim VS Smaart @ helge do not know . Maybe 1 of the guy's from rational knows how to do this . @ Matt I had the same problem with the Mid-highs in the first screenshot (big jumps just past 4K) . There's about 10 drivers in this 1 cabinet . So if i get to close to it i'll see multiple drivers and jumps in the phase and magnitude screen . If i take more distance from the cab coherence is going to drop but the ratio in distance difference between the multiple drivers reduces and the phase is going to flatten out a bit more but it will get harder to make choices regarding x-over/allpass filters . Also this is a brand new product and this is a good start but not the final product . There was no foam(? sorry i'm from the Netherlands so sometimes my english fails me) on the inside of the cab so this still has to be done . We just needed to test this before moving forward . Specially the onax vs ofax was something we needed to know and it came out rather well (could be better but not bad at all for a first try). To bad the intelli-x processor doesn't have elliptic filters up to now like the xta or Galileo has . They make the sound more natural (sorry can't put it in any other words) . For the rest of it : it's a comparison of data between both analyzers which is not done at this time (still need to compare some other stuff but that's for another measurement session :-) I had to do 3 more products after this 1 so i was happy to get this done and the 3 other measurements on 1 day . @matt again the jumps are definitely multiple drivers [ATTACH=CONFIG]152566.vB5-legacyid=7500[/ATTACH] In the image above you see in the blue line a semi straight line from 315 to just past 500 a jump and than on to just before 1k and on it goes . I see this also if i'm to close to a line array in the low to mid frequency range where the response is going from omni to slightly directional until you get to the high drivers which are directional . You can also see the same behavior a bit in the lower frequencies at the high mid section . I was pretty close to the cabinet . When i took a bit more difference it started to level out more and walking the room gave me a pretty good idea about this product . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Sim VS Smaart
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!