Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arthur Skudra" data-source="post: 65254" data-attributes="member: 131">Re: Smaart v7 vs. SysTune new Version?Do you want vanilla or chocolate ice cream for dessert?!?!&nbsp; Ketchup or gravy with your fries??&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Both are excellent measurement platforms, with comparable features and accuracy, each with it&#039;s own unique &quot;twist&quot; on how it&#039;s accomplished.&nbsp; The end result is the same:&nbsp; you determine what needs to be measured, whether or not the data you&#039;re seeing displayed on the computer screen is valid, and then you make the decisions on the data provided by your measurement tools.&nbsp; So the choice becomes primarily *how* you arrive at the end result.&nbsp; Yep, more a matter of taste than anything.Maybe some more detail from you on which computer platform you plan to use (Mac or Windows), how you plan to use the measurement tools, your workflow, how much and what kind of sound equipment you&#039;re measuring, how many mics are needed, what is your level of training/competency with dual channel FFT&#039;s, and what kinds of environments will you be measuring in?&nbsp; Budget?&nbsp;&nbsp; This kind of info would be helpful to those here who can offer advice and their opinions.&nbsp; In other words, what is important to you for measuring a sound system?Full disclosure:&nbsp; I am an instructor for Smaart.&nbsp; I will admit I have my own biases.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arthur Skudra, post: 65254, member: 131"] Re: Smaart v7 vs. SysTune new Version? Do you want vanilla or chocolate ice cream for dessert?!?! Ketchup or gravy with your fries?? :) Both are excellent measurement platforms, with comparable features and accuracy, each with it's own unique "twist" on how it's accomplished. The end result is the same: you determine what needs to be measured, whether or not the data you're seeing displayed on the computer screen is valid, and then you make the decisions on the data provided by your measurement tools. So the choice becomes primarily *how* you arrive at the end result. Yep, more a matter of taste than anything. Maybe some more detail from you on which computer platform you plan to use (Mac or Windows), how you plan to use the measurement tools, your workflow, how much and what kind of sound equipment you're measuring, how many mics are needed, what is your level of training/competency with dual channel FFT's, and what kinds of environments will you be measuring in? Budget? This kind of info would be helpful to those here who can offer advice and their opinions. In other words, what is important to you for measuring a sound system? Full disclosure: I am an instructor for Smaart. I will admit I have my own biases. [/QUOTE]

Verification