Wrote a piece about graphic EQs on my homepage, it's in Norwegian, but the pictures should be in Esperanto
Enjoy.
http://drbentsen.no/2011/04/under-lupen/
Enjoy.
http://drbentsen.no/2011/04/under-lupen/
Sometimes I wish a graphic EQ would be able to solve ANY issue on FOH or MON. It never does. ANY brand or ANY kind. It's just a hype or a myth, overblown by retarded riders. Please, find a strength to strike them from your ideology. (back then on PSW and still now from time to time, a guy comes by and lists his equipment, almost starting with some sort of graphic eq ... I mean ... what does it say about you or your system ... In my book : "Please, don't hire me!"
.
.
.
If your problem can be solved with a graphic EQ, you are the luckiest person in the world, but, wait a minute, that is me already. Lose it, you'll feel better.
Still, Helge, the effort is what counts.
Graphics have their place, that place is with band mixers not systems engineers. I don't think there is anything wrong with that either.
Graphics have their place, that place is with band mixers not systems engineers. I don't think there is anything wrong with that either.
What happens if your both the band engineer and system engineer ???
Use both types of EQ! ~:-D~:grin:
+1... GEQ are the equivalent of MASH surgery during wartime...
Nice analogy!
On a recent gig of mine designed with somebody else's gear, I chose not to use the six channels of graphic EQ he brought. He was dumbstruck. I used digital parametric EQ via DSP and got the rig sounding much better, I think than it could have otherwise. The boxes had a bunch of problems that fell between ISO frequencies.
-Bink