Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Sound Provider Refusing Band Engineer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matt Lillie" data-source="post: 99887" data-attributes="member: 84"><p>Re: Sound Provider Refusing Band Engineer?</p><p></p><p>You would think, right? Seems as though many band "engineers" are buddies with the drummer's cousin or something, couldn't mix paint, and will "work" for free beer and just to be in show business. I agree about the numbers, there doesn't seem to be enough qualified people or enough $$$ to hire competent people. Five years ago, you could do a weekend festival on an A stage and the headliners would have a BE. Now it seems every third tier act has their own BE and it's not unusual for every B stage act to have a BE. On the other hand, there are providers that think that once the act is on their job is done and it's time to grab a smoke or a cheeseburger and wait for the next changeover, never touch the console during the set. That would aggravate me as a band. </p><p></p><p>I also agree about letting whoever the BE is do their thing as long as they're not blowing stuff up. I was against the venue policy when it was being discussed, but the arguments from management persuaded me. They pay me good $$ to run the place, and part of that is for consistency. If there's a different guy every night and I'm just there to turn the rig on and then shut it down, they could get anybody. The venue wants it good every night, odds are against that if you let the drummer's cousin's buddy drive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matt Lillie, post: 99887, member: 84"] Re: Sound Provider Refusing Band Engineer? You would think, right? Seems as though many band "engineers" are buddies with the drummer's cousin or something, couldn't mix paint, and will "work" for free beer and just to be in show business. I agree about the numbers, there doesn't seem to be enough qualified people or enough $$$ to hire competent people. Five years ago, you could do a weekend festival on an A stage and the headliners would have a BE. Now it seems every third tier act has their own BE and it's not unusual for every B stage act to have a BE. On the other hand, there are providers that think that once the act is on their job is done and it's time to grab a smoke or a cheeseburger and wait for the next changeover, never touch the console during the set. That would aggravate me as a band. I also agree about letting whoever the BE is do their thing as long as they're not blowing stuff up. I was against the venue policy when it was being discussed, but the arguments from management persuaded me. They pay me good $$ to run the place, and part of that is for consistency. If there's a different guy every night and I'm just there to turn the rig on and then shut it down, they could get anybody. The venue wants it good every night, odds are against that if you let the drummer's cousin's buddy drive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Sound Provider Refusing Band Engineer?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!