Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Speaker Processing Advice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 145511" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Speaker Processing Advice</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah...not stupid. </p><p></p><p>I can't help much with talking to DSP du jour but I remember filters from 30 years ago when I was designing (analog) crossovers. </p><p></p><p>Those filter alignments are not LR, which use identical stacked 2 pole Butterworth alignments. Staggering the poles above and below the XO point is typical of a Chebyshev alignment. The Chebyshev alignment plays games by trading increased ripple in the passband before roll-off in exchange for steeper slopes in the cut-off region. I don't think I've ever seen Chebyshev used in crossovers (but what do I know <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /> ). </p><p></p><p>The LR is popular for how the two bandpasses meld together in the crossover region. The phase lead and lag add up to one full rotation to be back in phase again,,, (at least on paper or for listening to steady state tones). </p><p></p><p>Standard LR alignments are not a bad place to start. </p><p></p><p>JR</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 145511, member: 126"] Re: Speaker Processing Advice Nah...not stupid. I can't help much with talking to DSP du jour but I remember filters from 30 years ago when I was designing (analog) crossovers. Those filter alignments are not LR, which use identical stacked 2 pole Butterworth alignments. Staggering the poles above and below the XO point is typical of a Chebyshev alignment. The Chebyshev alignment plays games by trading increased ripple in the passband before roll-off in exchange for steeper slopes in the cut-off region. I don't think I've ever seen Chebyshev used in crossovers (but what do I know :-) ). The LR is popular for how the two bandpasses meld together in the crossover region. The phase lead and lag add up to one full rotation to be back in phase again,,, (at least on paper or for listening to steady state tones). Standard LR alignments are not a bad place to start. JR [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Speaker Processing Advice
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!