Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brad Weber" data-source="post: 17784" data-attributes="member: 114">Re: Speakers in adverse conditionsMy concern is what levels and fidelity they are envisioning.&nbsp; I also don&#039;t get the stereo pairs, with four stereo pairs it seems like only four people will be able to get the desired effect and that only if there is no one standing next to them or anything else affecting their hearing either channel.&nbsp;This reminded me of the &#039;&#039;aural designer&#039;&#039; who proposed a multi-channel, enveloping audio experience for a corporate client.&nbsp; We noted that since the proposed location for this was in a circular rotunda space with primarily glass walls, a marble floor and a domed glass ceiling, just about any sound in there would be enveloping and the idea of multiple discrete audio sources would be impossible to maintain.&nbsp; The concept, as good as it might have been as a concept, simply didn&#039;t fit the application.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brad Weber, post: 17784, member: 114"] Re: Speakers in adverse conditions My concern is what levels and fidelity they are envisioning. I also don't get the stereo pairs, with four stereo pairs it seems like only four people will be able to get the desired effect and that only if there is no one standing next to them or anything else affecting their hearing either channel. This reminded me of the ''aural designer'' who proposed a multi-channel, enveloping audio experience for a corporate client. We noted that since the proposed location for this was in a circular rotunda space with primarily glass walls, a marble floor and a domed glass ceiling, just about any sound in there would be enveloping and the idea of multiple discrete audio sources would be impossible to maintain. The concept, as good as it might have been as a concept, simply didn't fit the application. [/QUOTE]

Verification