Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Stereo vs bridged mono
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Roberts" data-source="post: 76230" data-attributes="member: 126"><p>Re: Stereo vs bridged mono</p><p></p><p>Life was simpler in the good old days when men were men and they didn't run amps bridged, or down to 2 ohms. :-(</p><p></p><p>While most of the discussion so far is accurate it doesn't really address your question, or what your question should be. </p><p></p><p>Yes, distortion is higher in bridge mode but only very slightly higher, just like running an amp at 2 ohms is higher distortion than that same amp at 4 ohms. So yes, distortion may be higher, but no, it is NOT AUDIBLE in my informed judgement. </p><p></p><p>One benefit from not running your amps at maximum load normally, is that you can double up in case of an emergency, like a random amp channel crapping out, which does happen even with premium amps. In fully loaded/bridged mode, one channel going down takes out the whole amp... With bigger amps running stereo, just move the speaker, or speakers to another amp, and keep on truckin. </p><p></p><p>If everything is running bridged and already maxed out you have nowhere to go. </p><p></p><p>Another subtle benefit from running bigger amps less hard is you have more thermal headroom (so you could play louder longer), and reliability will be better from lower operating temps (MTBF doubles for every 10'C drop).. </p><p></p><p>JR</p><p></p><p>PS Running the amps with less headroom, could lead to occasional transient current limiting, that might be too brief to register on meters, but may be subtly audible (like transient clipping), on clean but loud program material.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Roberts, post: 76230, member: 126"] Re: Stereo vs bridged mono Life was simpler in the good old days when men were men and they didn't run amps bridged, or down to 2 ohms. :-( While most of the discussion so far is accurate it doesn't really address your question, or what your question should be. Yes, distortion is higher in bridge mode but only very slightly higher, just like running an amp at 2 ohms is higher distortion than that same amp at 4 ohms. So yes, distortion may be higher, but no, it is NOT AUDIBLE in my informed judgement. One benefit from not running your amps at maximum load normally, is that you can double up in case of an emergency, like a random amp channel crapping out, which does happen even with premium amps. In fully loaded/bridged mode, one channel going down takes out the whole amp... With bigger amps running stereo, just move the speaker, or speakers to another amp, and keep on truckin. If everything is running bridged and already maxed out you have nowhere to go. Another subtle benefit from running bigger amps less hard is you have more thermal headroom (so you could play louder longer), and reliability will be better from lower operating temps (MTBF doubles for every 10'C drop).. JR PS Running the amps with less headroom, could lead to occasional transient current limiting, that might be too brief to register on meters, but may be subtly audible (like transient clipping), on clean but loud program material. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Stereo vs bridged mono
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!