Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Subwoofer comparison SRX728 vs Vertec 4883
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Phil Graham" data-source="post: 59573" data-attributes="member: 430"><p>Re: Subwoofer comparison SRX728 vs Vertec 4883</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Peter,</p><p></p><p>Let's agree to disagree here. The impedance curve does indeed show a tiny bump from the mass reactance at 300Hz, and this is characteristic of a bandpass. However, the effect is so subtle, and so high in frequency, that it defies the semantic notion of a bandpass as people tend to think of it. You can see a similar effect from the recessing of a driver baffle to allow for excursion.</p><p></p><p>-Phil</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Phil Graham, post: 59573, member: 430"] Re: Subwoofer comparison SRX728 vs Vertec 4883 Peter, Let's agree to disagree here. The impedance curve does indeed show a tiny bump from the mass reactance at 300Hz, and this is characteristic of a bandpass. However, the effect is so subtle, and so high in frequency, that it defies the semantic notion of a bandpass as people tend to think of it. You can see a similar effect from the recessing of a driver baffle to allow for excursion. -Phil [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Subwoofer comparison SRX728 vs Vertec 4883
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!