Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Test what you think you know: Part 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jay Barracato" data-source="post: 121424" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Re: Test what you think you know: Part 2</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because the people doing it don't understand how they are changing the behavior of the mic. I have never heard anyone using the technique actually discuss the type of foam used. I have seen towels used, sweatshirts used, bubble wrap used, both open and closed cell camp pads, and any assortment of packing materials. I have even seen aurelux used, an expensive way to quickly suck.</p><p></p><p>My opinion, based on my experience, is the resulting sound sucks. If what you want for the bass is a muffled thud, with no definition, no attack, and no sustain, this might be the technique for you.</p><p></p><p>Some people will trust my experience, others will want some reason. I think I can now say, based on this, that blocking the ports changes the response of the microphone. We can quibble all day about how much different materials will block the ports, but while that is happening I am just going to walk over to my mic box and pull out a pro35 which is my quick solution for a bass with no pickups that the player doesn't have their own preferred method.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jay Barracato, post: 121424, member: 24"] Re: Test what you think you know: Part 2 Because the people doing it don't understand how they are changing the behavior of the mic. I have never heard anyone using the technique actually discuss the type of foam used. I have seen towels used, sweatshirts used, bubble wrap used, both open and closed cell camp pads, and any assortment of packing materials. I have even seen aurelux used, an expensive way to quickly suck. My opinion, based on my experience, is the resulting sound sucks. If what you want for the bass is a muffled thud, with no definition, no attack, and no sustain, this might be the technique for you. Some people will trust my experience, others will want some reason. I think I can now say, based on this, that blocking the ports changes the response of the microphone. We can quibble all day about how much different materials will block the ports, but while that is happening I am just going to walk over to my mic box and pull out a pro35 which is my quick solution for a bass with no pickups that the player doesn't have their own preferred method. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Test what you think you know: Part 2
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!