Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
UL Who?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silas Pradetto" data-source="post: 24459" data-attributes="member: 34"><p>Re: UL Who?</p><p></p><p>Adrian, you're fired. HA!</p><p></p><p>However that should be enclosed, UL isn't the right regulating authority to be calling out on this one. Most distros are NOT UL listed, except maybe Motion Labs. For example, nothing AmpShop makes is UL listed, but electrical inspectors usually look for what looks 'legit' versus what looks 'custom' and therefore most anything AmpShop makes would pass.</p><p></p><p>And, there might even be a line that once that panel is in the rack, it <em>is </em>enclosed. </p><p></p><p>Steve, besides enclosing the back of the panel, what else would you change? Let's make this a learning experience.</p><p></p><p>I can see that there should be a bushing or some sort of cord grip for the THHN rather than a Romex connector.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">Edit: The panel above uses the correct connectors and correct size wire for the Powercon on the other side. I can vouch that internally, it is properly pigtailed and assembled with crimped connectors on the screw terminals. There is no 'push' wiring in there, like most consumer receptacles.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">The difference between average Joe doing a custom panel like this, and someone that knows code and proper conventions, is that even though that panel looks ugly, it's not going to catch on fire/electrocute anyone/fail. Whereas, if average Joe did one and it was enclosed, but all wrong internally, the potential for failure would be far higher.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silas Pradetto, post: 24459, member: 34"] Re: UL Who? Adrian, you're fired. HA! However that should be enclosed, UL isn't the right regulating authority to be calling out on this one. Most distros are NOT UL listed, except maybe Motion Labs. For example, nothing AmpShop makes is UL listed, but electrical inspectors usually look for what looks 'legit' versus what looks 'custom' and therefore most anything AmpShop makes would pass. And, there might even be a line that once that panel is in the rack, it [I]is [/I]enclosed. Steve, besides enclosing the back of the panel, what else would you change? Let's make this a learning experience. I can see that there should be a bushing or some sort of cord grip for the THHN rather than a Romex connector. [SIZE="1"]Edit: The panel above uses the correct connectors and correct size wire for the Powercon on the other side. I can vouch that internally, it is properly pigtailed and assembled with crimped connectors on the screw terminals. There is no 'push' wiring in there, like most consumer receptacles. The difference between average Joe doing a custom panel like this, and someone that knows code and proper conventions, is that even though that panel looks ugly, it's not going to catch on fire/electrocute anyone/fail. Whereas, if average Joe did one and it was enclosed, but all wrong internally, the potential for failure would be far higher.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Off Topic
The Basement
UL Who?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!