Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="William Kueppers" data-source="post: 106425" data-attributes="member: 4925">Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&amp;ALieber Uli,Vielen Dank fuer ihre schnelle Antwort leider ist es eine schnelle Antwort. Let me explain. You stated that the iX16 is fundamentally&nbsp; redesigned from input of valuable customers. My first question of course is who are these valuable customers? Forum members? Feedback from where? Public or private? Since it is a fundamental redesign that means your current iX16 as shown on your website is no longer a product. So how can we determine what you are eluding to has any value whatsoever? Features/$.&nbsp; I believe you received plenty of feedback on the Internet and probably elsewhere regarding the existing design and most of it positive. You&#039;re certainly keeping Mackie and others guessing including your paying customers. There is certainly a tradeoff there. Personally I would like to see a reduced cost x32 call it what you want without the i. Remove the front panel on a rack, make the AES50 and Ultranet optional (plug in card) and provide a place for the required control surfaces and WiFi. Loose the DL look. Even Bill Gates realized early on that a dual code base was a drain on resources, hence NT4. Since I&#039;m a recent customer of the X32 I have yet to formulate a new features wish list and V2 will probably postpone that. I do hope that you will surprise us in a positive way without years of waiting.RegardsWilliam</blockquote>

[QUOTE="William Kueppers, post: 106425, member: 4925"] Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A Lieber Uli, Vielen Dank fuer ihre schnelle Antwort leider ist es eine schnelle Antwort. Let me explain. You stated that the iX16 is fundamentally redesigned from input of valuable customers. My first question of course is who are these valuable customers? Forum members? Feedback from where? Public or private? Since it is a fundamental redesign that means your current iX16 as shown on your website is no longer a product. So how can we determine what you are eluding to has any value whatsoever? Features/$. I believe you received plenty of feedback on the Internet and probably elsewhere regarding the existing design and most of it positive. You're certainly keeping Mackie and others guessing including your paying customers. There is certainly a tradeoff there. Personally I would like to see a reduced cost x32 call it what you want without the i. Remove the front panel on a rack, make the AES50 and Ultranet optional (plug in card) and provide a place for the required control surfaces and WiFi. Loose the DL look. Even Bill Gates realized early on that a dual code base was a drain on resources, hence NT4. Since I'm a recent customer of the X32 I have yet to formulate a new features wish list and V2 will probably postpone that. I do hope that you will surprise us in a positive way without years of waiting. Regards William [/QUOTE]

Verification