Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Per Søvik" data-source="post: 59785" data-attributes="member: 1285"><p>Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A</p><p></p><p></p><p>As far as I can tell, an ethernetport is physically unable to handle the sync signals. RX+, RX-, TX+ and TX- are the same, but the four wires that do the sync are used for ground and Power Over Ethernet, so the sync signals are simply not available. I thought it would be possible to just buffer the datastream for recording, but the AES50 port won't transmit without sync. Seems to be a good reason why we can't have a really cheap interface, but then again, the S16 with two ports costs half of what the Lynx card costs, so the transceiver chip isn't <u>that</u> expensive. With the potential market for AES50 computer interfaces now virtually exploding, someone neshould really grasp the opportunity if Lynx can't.</p><p>I imagine Uli can get a card produced next door to his own factory if it is impractical to do it in house <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />~<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />~:smile:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Per Søvik, post: 59785, member: 1285"] Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A As far as I can tell, an ethernetport is physically unable to handle the sync signals. RX+, RX-, TX+ and TX- are the same, but the four wires that do the sync are used for ground and Power Over Ethernet, so the sync signals are simply not available. I thought it would be possible to just buffer the datastream for recording, but the AES50 port won't transmit without sync. Seems to be a good reason why we can't have a really cheap interface, but then again, the S16 with two ports costs half of what the Lynx card costs, so the transceiver chip isn't [U]that[/U] expensive. With the potential market for AES50 computer interfaces now virtually exploding, someone neshould really grasp the opportunity if Lynx can't. I imagine Uli can get a card produced next door to his own factory if it is impractical to do it in house :)~:-)~:smile: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!