Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Gotch" data-source="post: 88769" data-attributes="member: 4345"><p>Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A Question and suggestion Re ,X32</p><p></p><p>I've recently been looking at post mixing multichannel recordings and it's struck me that the available options are extraordinarily expensive. At the bottom end things are constrained by the Mackie HUI protocol being limited to 8 channels and at the top end the price of ProTools and the associated Avid control surfaces is eye watering.</p><p></p><p>The X32 could be the basis of a much cheaper solution via OSC however support in major DAWs is lacking.</p><p></p><p>Could Uli comment on if this is a market that Behringer could open up to users who don't have the pockets to spend 5 or 6 figure sums with Avid?</p><p></p><p>For example things that could be done in no particular order are:</p><p>-Supplying OSC pattern configs for the 32 for use with reaper (<a href="http://www.reaper.fm/" target="_blank">REAPER | Audio Production Without Limits</a>) which as far as I can tell is the only DAW to officially support OSC currently.</p><p>-Bringing something like <a href="http://x32midiosc.gido.info/x32midiosc/" target="_blank">Using Behringer X32 as DAW controller | X32MidiOsc</a> in house although I appreciate this may be impossible due to the agreements around Mackie HUI licensing.</p><p>-Encouraging Steinberg to natively support OSC in Nuendo and Apple to support it in Logic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Gotch, post: 88769, member: 4345"] Re: Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A Question and suggestion Re ,X32 I've recently been looking at post mixing multichannel recordings and it's struck me that the available options are extraordinarily expensive. At the bottom end things are constrained by the Mackie HUI protocol being limited to 8 channels and at the top end the price of ProTools and the associated Avid control surfaces is eye watering. The X32 could be the basis of a much cheaper solution via OSC however support in major DAWs is lacking. Could Uli comment on if this is a market that Behringer could open up to users who don't have the pockets to spend 5 or 6 figure sums with Avid? For example things that could be done in no particular order are: -Supplying OSC pattern configs for the 32 for use with reaper ([url=http://www.reaper.fm/]REAPER | Audio Production Without Limits[/url]) which as far as I can tell is the only DAW to officially support OSC currently. -Bringing something like [url=http://x32midiosc.gido.info/x32midiosc/]Using Behringer X32 as DAW controller | X32MidiOsc[/url] in house although I appreciate this may be impossible due to the agreements around Mackie HUI licensing. -Encouraging Steinberg to natively support OSC in Nuendo and Apple to support it in Logic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Uli Behringer of The Music Group Q&A
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!