Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rasmus Rosenberg" data-source="post: 39186" data-attributes="member: 886">Re: Virtual SMAART training: Tell the crossover frequency and typeHowever you want to phrase it. I&#039;m most interested in people expositing their thought process, as this is what we can talk abouHey Phil, Great post, hopefully most smart users (who have taking a class) would have a thought process some thing like 1. Data is meaning less with out context..caution, caution2.Where is the coherence trace?3.Where is the coherence trace?4. Is there not supposed to be a coherence trace, even with averaged traces?5. Why is the live impulse resonse not running, not viewing the full (or a fuller) picture, caution, cautionI generally think post like this are super great, and we all learn a lot from them so keep em coming.Rasmus</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rasmus Rosenberg, post: 39186, member: 886"] Re: Virtual SMAART training: Tell the crossover frequency and type [COLOR=#222222][FONT=Times]However you want to phrase it. I'm most interested in people expositing their thought process, as this is what we can talk abou Hey Phil, Great post, hopefully most smart users (who have taking a class) would have a thought process some thing like 1. Data is meaning less with out context..caution, caution 2.Where is the coherence trace? 3.Where is the coherence trace? 4. Is there not supposed to be a coherence trace, even with averaged traces? 5. Why is the live impulse resonse not running, not viewing the full (or a fuller) picture, caution, caution I generally think post like this are super great, and we all learn a lot from them so keep em coming. Rasmus[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification