Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tim McCulloch" data-source="post: 123178" data-attributes="member: 67">Re: Wedge for Talking Head?I&#039;ve had both extremes on the same event, sometimes with sequential presenters.&nbsp; One wants a confidence monitor, and he is explicit that what he hears is what the audience hears.&nbsp; Uh... fine, we can do that.&nbsp; Mostly.&nbsp; Another wants to be impressed with the sound of her own voice (on a lav) regardless of what it does to the house audio.&nbsp; Another wants no monitor at all, because if he hears himself he talks quieter.The most common request is for the Invisible Q&amp;A Monitor.&nbsp; Funny, but you can have the powerpoint video monitors in the most obtrusive places, but heaven forbid we should see a tiny loudspeaker...I always plan for a foldback send for Q&amp;A, though.&nbsp; Lately there has been a trend to using Twitter to send questions, they appear on the VDO confidence monitors and on the IMAG screens after selection by whoever vets the questions.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tim McCulloch, post: 123178, member: 67"] Re: Wedge for Talking Head? I've had both extremes on the same event, sometimes with sequential presenters. One wants a confidence monitor, and he is explicit that what he hears is what the audience hears. Uh... fine, we can do that. Mostly. Another wants to be impressed with the sound of her own voice (on a lav) regardless of what it does to the house audio. Another wants no monitor at all, because if he hears himself he talks quieter. The most common request is for the Invisible Q&A Monitor. Funny, but you can have the powerpoint video monitors in the most obtrusive places, but heaven forbid we should see a tiny loudspeaker... I always plan for a foldback send for Q&A, though. Lately there has been a trend to using Twitter to send questions, they appear on the VDO confidence monitors and on the IMAG screens after selection by whoever vets the questions. [/QUOTE]

Verification