Reply to thread

Message

Re: Well, THAT's Not Gonna Fucking Work!

Well I reproduced the phase response in the HF now. The error comes from a one sample difference of the t0 to the impulse response of the HF LP filter type response of a DSP. I'll produce the results here in the forum later on. This is what I was wondering about originally. The t0 choice can dramatically effect results with SMAART or when other measurements which determine the frequency response from the FFT of the derived impulse response. I would like to also point out that I will make available all algorithms and programs which I used to make my measurements if requested. I can't pass out the swept sine programs but the algorithms I will give away for free. In fact they are on www.cascadeacoustic.com in the tutorial section. The Lock-In Amp program from Feldman I will pass on if anyone wants.

P.S. I'm not trying to sell any product to the sound reinforcement industry. I don't want anyone to think my website plug is against SMAART or SysTune. Course I'll bet on the SysTune measurements all day above others.

I'm still trying to get a SMAART system down here... duh this is taking like a week... too long. We have five licenses.

<blockquote data-quote="Mark DeArman" data-source="post: 39934" data-attributes="member: 950">Re: Well, THAT&#039;s Not Gonna Fucking Work!Well I reproduced the phase response in the HF now.&nbsp; The error comes from a one sample difference of the t0 to the impulse response of the HF LP filter type response of a DSP.&nbsp; I&#039;ll produce the results here in the forum later on.&nbsp; This is what I was wondering about originally.&nbsp; The t0 choice can dramatically effect results with SMAART or when other measurements which determine the frequency response from the FFT of the derived impulse response.&nbsp; I would like to also point out that I will make available all algorithms and programs which I used to make my measurements if requested.&nbsp; I can&#039;t pass out the swept sine programs but the algorithms I will give away for free.&nbsp; In fact they are on <a href="http://www.cascadeacoustic.com" target="_blank">www.cascadeacoustic.com</a> in the tutorial section.&nbsp; The Lock-In Amp program from Feldman I will pass on if anyone wants.P.S. I&#039;m not trying to sell any product to the sound reinforcement industry.&nbsp; I don&#039;t want anyone to think my website plug is against SMAART or SysTune.&nbsp; Course I&#039;ll bet on the SysTune measurements all day above others.I&#039;m still trying to get a SMAART system down here...&nbsp; duh this is taking like a week... too long.&nbsp; We have five licenses.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark DeArman, post: 39934, member: 950"] Re: Well, THAT's Not Gonna Fucking Work! Well I reproduced the phase response in the HF now. The error comes from a one sample difference of the t0 to the impulse response of the HF LP filter type response of a DSP. I'll produce the results here in the forum later on. This is what I was wondering about originally. The t0 choice can dramatically effect results with SMAART or when other measurements which determine the frequency response from the FFT of the derived impulse response. I would like to also point out that I will make available all algorithms and programs which I used to make my measurements if requested. I can't pass out the swept sine programs but the algorithms I will give away for free. In fact they are on [URL="http://www.cascadeacoustic.com"]www.cascadeacoustic.com[/URL] in the tutorial section. The Lock-In Amp program from Feldman I will pass on if anyone wants. P.S. I'm not trying to sell any product to the sound reinforcement industry. I don't want anyone to think my website plug is against SMAART or SysTune. Course I'll bet on the SysTune measurements all day above others. I'm still trying to get a SMAART system down here... duh this is taking like a week... too long. We have five licenses. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Top Bottom