Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Well, THAT's Not Gonna Fucking Work!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mark DeArman" data-source="post: 39934" data-attributes="member: 950"><p>Re: Well, THAT's Not Gonna Fucking Work!</p><p></p><p>Well I reproduced the phase response in the HF now. The error comes from a one sample difference of the t0 to the impulse response of the HF LP filter type response of a DSP. I'll produce the results here in the forum later on. This is what I was wondering about originally. The t0 choice can dramatically effect results with SMAART or when other measurements which determine the frequency response from the FFT of the derived impulse response. I would like to also point out that I will make available all algorithms and programs which I used to make my measurements if requested. I can't pass out the swept sine programs but the algorithms I will give away for free. In fact they are on <a href="http://www.cascadeacoustic.com" target="_blank">www.cascadeacoustic.com</a> in the tutorial section. The Lock-In Amp program from Feldman I will pass on if anyone wants.</p><p></p><p>P.S. I'm not trying to sell any product to the sound reinforcement industry. I don't want anyone to think my website plug is against SMAART or SysTune. Course I'll bet on the SysTune measurements all day above others.</p><p></p><p>I'm still trying to get a SMAART system down here... duh this is taking like a week... too long. We have five licenses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mark DeArman, post: 39934, member: 950"] Re: Well, THAT's Not Gonna Fucking Work! Well I reproduced the phase response in the HF now. The error comes from a one sample difference of the t0 to the impulse response of the HF LP filter type response of a DSP. I'll produce the results here in the forum later on. This is what I was wondering about originally. The t0 choice can dramatically effect results with SMAART or when other measurements which determine the frequency response from the FFT of the derived impulse response. I would like to also point out that I will make available all algorithms and programs which I used to make my measurements if requested. I can't pass out the swept sine programs but the algorithms I will give away for free. In fact they are on [URL="http://www.cascadeacoustic.com"]www.cascadeacoustic.com[/URL] in the tutorial section. The Lock-In Amp program from Feldman I will pass on if anyone wants. P.S. I'm not trying to sell any product to the sound reinforcement industry. I don't want anyone to think my website plug is against SMAART or SysTune. Course I'll bet on the SysTune measurements all day above others. I'm still trying to get a SMAART system down here... duh this is taking like a week... too long. We have five licenses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Varsity
Well, THAT's Not Gonna Fucking Work!
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!