Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jay Barracato" data-source="post: 41493" data-attributes="member: 24">Re: What is the audible effect of 180 polarity change between HF and mids?While music is definitely more transient in nature than a steady state test signal, I can&#039;t help but wondering if any meaningful definition of &quot;transient response&quot; hasn&#039;t been destroyed by marketing programs.Here is a &quot;Fermi&quot; numbers estimation for the number of waveforms in a guitar note tone at 2000Hz:The fastest guitar player out their playing at 220 bpm in 16th notes would play 14.7 notes per second or 0.068 sec per noteAt 2000 hz each waveform is 0.0005 secTherefore, each note consists of 136 waveformsFor the same guitar player at 500 hz, there are still 34 waveforms per note.I don&#039;t believe I have ever seen any research into &quot;how fast can we hear&quot; or what is the minimum number of vibrations needed for us to recognize it as sound.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jay Barracato, post: 41493, member: 24"] Re: What is the audible effect of 180 polarity change between HF and mids? While music is definitely more transient in nature than a steady state test signal, I can't help but wondering if any meaningful definition of "transient response" hasn't been destroyed by marketing programs. Here is a "Fermi" numbers estimation for the number of waveforms in a guitar note tone at 2000Hz: The fastest guitar player out their playing at 220 bpm in 16th notes would play 14.7 notes per second or 0.068 sec per note At 2000 hz each waveform is 0.0005 sec Therefore, each note consists of 136 waveforms For the same guitar player at 500 hz, there are still 34 waveforms per note. I don't believe I have ever seen any research into "how fast can we hear" or what is the minimum number of vibrations needed for us to recognize it as sound. [/QUOTE]

Verification