Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Whats the point of send/receive channel inserts versus TRS?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brandon Blakeney" data-source="post: 4530" data-attributes="member: 178"><p>I have an ML3000, but in looking at some used ML4000's and 5000's I noticed that the inserts are different. Rather than just a TRS "insert," there is both a send and receive connector on each channel. I used to have a Mackie SR40.8 with the same config......Does anybody know why Allen & Heath had this different even within the same series of console?? Seems like it might be a more "reliable" insert system, but also seems more time consuming for patching to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brandon Blakeney, post: 4530, member: 178"] I have an ML3000, but in looking at some used ML4000's and 5000's I noticed that the inserts are different. Rather than just a TRS "insert," there is both a send and receive connector on each channel. I used to have a Mackie SR40.8 with the same config......Does anybody know why Allen & Heath had this different even within the same series of console?? Seems like it might be a more "reliable" insert system, but also seems more time consuming for patching to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Whats the point of send/receive channel inserts versus TRS?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
