Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Which Graphic EQ is "better"??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kip Conner" data-source="post: 33285" data-attributes="member: 445"><p>Re: Which Graphic EQ is "better"??</p><p></p><p>If YOU can't tell a difference audibly speaking- which one is the easier of the two to use functionality-wise? The dimensions seem to be about the same so it comes down to a few features. First, I have always found the Rane unit a little awkward in their input knobs... 0 to 10... 10 what? You also get a limiter in the DBX and Noise Reduction. I can't say that I have ever used these two features, but if it's on your B/C rig than you might not have limiting some where else. The other thing that is unclear about the Rane unit is the max input and min output gain- I couldn't find it anywhere in the spec sheet... The DBX clearly tells you that it works in the +22dB area on both ends so you have plenty of headroom. The Rane seems like a DBX160 in the sense that you have to feel your way through it because they are very rarely ever calibrated. </p><p></p><p>So which system needs the extra features and is it possible that you take out the C system more than the B system?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kip Conner, post: 33285, member: 445"] Re: Which Graphic EQ is "better"?? If YOU can't tell a difference audibly speaking- which one is the easier of the two to use functionality-wise? The dimensions seem to be about the same so it comes down to a few features. First, I have always found the Rane unit a little awkward in their input knobs... 0 to 10... 10 what? You also get a limiter in the DBX and Noise Reduction. I can't say that I have ever used these two features, but if it's on your B/C rig than you might not have limiting some where else. The other thing that is unclear about the Rane unit is the max input and min output gain- I couldn't find it anywhere in the spec sheet... The DBX clearly tells you that it works in the +22dB area on both ends so you have plenty of headroom. The Rane seems like a DBX160 in the sense that you have to feel your way through it because they are very rarely ever calibrated. So which system needs the extra features and is it possible that you take out the C system more than the B system? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Which Graphic EQ is "better"??
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!