Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Which Graphic EQ is "better"??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kip Conner" data-source="post: 33354" data-attributes="member: 445"><p>Re: Which Graphic EQ is "better"??</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks I couldn't find that Rane input level info anywhere. The calibration comment was meant to describe a DBX160 that hasn't been calibrated. I haven't used one in a while, but if you tried to look at the meters on one of those things and rely on it for truth, you could be trouble. Most of the ones that I ever came across told tales of input and gain reduction. They were based on the older analog units and had a small screw in the back for calibration. </p><p></p><p>Point was the Rane, like the DBX160, provide no real indication of what is actually happening due to the arbitrary 0 to 10 gains. Now if you can find one that goes to 11, that would be cool. </p><p></p><p>I'd be curious, where does one set the input and output of a older rane device to maintain proper gain structure?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kip Conner, post: 33354, member: 445"] Re: Which Graphic EQ is "better"?? Thanks I couldn't find that Rane input level info anywhere. The calibration comment was meant to describe a DBX160 that hasn't been calibrated. I haven't used one in a while, but if you tried to look at the meters on one of those things and rely on it for truth, you could be trouble. Most of the ones that I ever came across told tales of input and gain reduction. They were based on the older analog units and had a small screw in the back for calibration. Point was the Rane, like the DBX160, provide no real indication of what is actually happening due to the arbitrary 0 to 10 gains. Now if you can find one that goes to 11, that would be cool. I'd be curious, where does one set the input and output of a older rane device to maintain proper gain structure? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Which Graphic EQ is "better"??
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!