Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
Lighting & Electrical
Which is more useful: RGBA or RGBW?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rob Timmerman" data-source="post: 57234" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>Re: Which is more useful: RGBA or RGBW?</p><p></p><p>This depends heavily on the implementation.</p><p></p><p>In theory, RGBA will have a wider color gamut than RGBW, perhaps at the expense of a lower CRI white. RGBW will typically have more output on whiteish colors.</p><p></p><p>In practice, amber LEDs are much lower output than red, green, blue, or white LEDs (the exception is the phosphor-converted amber manufactured by Lumileds), making them much less useful than one would think. This, combined with a bit of time adjusting the yellow from mixing the red and green channels, reduces the importance of having an amber channel (it's possible to get a decent yellow or orange from any RGB fixture with good color mixing).</p><p></p><p>How useful RGBW is depends on the CCT of the white channel. CCTs around 3500K-4500K tend to work pretty well for color mixing, and look "white", but higher CCTs are more efficient and allow for a manufacturer to claim more output. A good white channel also offers a decent starting point for a white light wash, as well as typically having a higher CRI than an RGB only fixture (or an RGBA fixture).</p><p></p><p>Horses for courses, but I'd probably take RGBA for lighting scenery, and RGBW for lighting people. And I'd prefer RGBAW to either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rob Timmerman, post: 57234, member: 172"] Re: Which is more useful: RGBA or RGBW? This depends heavily on the implementation. In theory, RGBA will have a wider color gamut than RGBW, perhaps at the expense of a lower CRI white. RGBW will typically have more output on whiteish colors. In practice, amber LEDs are much lower output than red, green, blue, or white LEDs (the exception is the phosphor-converted amber manufactured by Lumileds), making them much less useful than one would think. This, combined with a bit of time adjusting the yellow from mixing the red and green channels, reduces the importance of having an amber channel (it's possible to get a decent yellow or orange from any RGB fixture with good color mixing). How useful RGBW is depends on the CCT of the white channel. CCTs around 3500K-4500K tend to work pretty well for color mixing, and look "white", but higher CCTs are more efficient and allow for a manufacturer to claim more output. A good white channel also offers a decent starting point for a white light wash, as well as typically having a higher CRI than an RGB only fixture (or an RGBA fixture). Horses for courses, but I'd probably take RGBA for lighting scenery, and RGBW for lighting people. And I'd prefer RGBAW to either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Low Earth Orbit
Lighting & Electrical
Which is more useful: RGBA or RGBW?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!