Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Installs
Whirlwind Contractor Splitter Used Backwards?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Peter Etheredge" data-source="post: 47917" data-attributes="member: 58"><p>Re: Whirlwind Contractor Splitter Used Backwards?</p><p></p><p>Geoff,</p><p></p><p>This is basically confirming my initial thought on this thing.</p><p></p><p>There are indeed transformers installed however they are not jumpered from what I can tell. There is a Whirlwind phantom supply that is wired in and on at all times, however the phantom on the console still has to be on, at least when the MASS is connected on this side; I think i'll try and see if the phantom works on the other side or if the board needs to be on.</p><p></p><p>Either way I think it would probably be prudent to get rid of this system and just make a passive connection. Anyone think there's a good reason not to?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Peter Etheredge, post: 47917, member: 58"] Re: Whirlwind Contractor Splitter Used Backwards? Geoff, This is basically confirming my initial thought on this thing. There are indeed transformers installed however they are not jumpered from what I can tell. There is a Whirlwind phantom supply that is wired in and on at all times, however the phantom on the console still has to be on, at least when the MASS is connected on this side; I think i'll try and see if the phantom works on the other side or if the board needs to be on. Either way I think it would probably be prudent to get rid of this system and just make a passive connection. Anyone think there's a good reason not to? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Installs
Whirlwind Contractor Splitter Used Backwards?
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!
