Log in
Register
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
News
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Features
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Why is mixing considered...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jay Barracato" data-source="post: 34061" data-attributes="member: 24"><p>Re: Why is mixing considered...</p><p></p><p>For Jason and Hammer,</p><p></p><p>I am not sure which is the chicken or the egg. Is that pay and responsibility due to the person mixing being responsible for all aspects of the sound, or is it because the person responsible for all aspects of the sound also happens to be the one mixing?</p><p></p><p>I like the way Dick said it and put it into musical terms but: Great system = easy mixing, Less than good system = difficult evening.</p><p></p><p>My comments were really more addressed to the levels under where a band is touring an entire crew, and where the house tech sees having a guest engineer as something unusual or infrequent. On the other boards there were some comments that were negative to band techs.I was basically thinking of some polite way to say to the house engineers "If every guest engineer on your system is unable to get a good mix, maybe you better start trying to figure out what is wrong with the system."</p><p></p><p>As with any performer that is doing a large number of shows, I have had nights that were up and nights that were down. I tend to nitpick at the performances that were less than my standards, but it seems that the shows that really had significant mix "problems" were invariably equipment related. I can only really think of one show where it was honestly my mental "I should have known that" goof that started when I believed a house tech about the way his system was patched.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jay Barracato, post: 34061, member: 24"] Re: Why is mixing considered... For Jason and Hammer, I am not sure which is the chicken or the egg. Is that pay and responsibility due to the person mixing being responsible for all aspects of the sound, or is it because the person responsible for all aspects of the sound also happens to be the one mixing? I like the way Dick said it and put it into musical terms but: Great system = easy mixing, Less than good system = difficult evening. My comments were really more addressed to the levels under where a band is touring an entire crew, and where the house tech sees having a guest engineer as something unusual or infrequent. On the other boards there were some comments that were negative to band techs.I was basically thinking of some polite way to say to the house engineers "If every guest engineer on your system is unable to get a good mix, maybe you better start trying to figure out what is wrong with the system." As with any performer that is doing a large number of shows, I have had nights that were up and nights that were down. I tend to nitpick at the performances that were less than my standards, but it seems that the shows that really had significant mix "problems" were invariably equipment related. I can only really think of one show where it was honestly my mental "I should have known that" goof that started when I believed a house tech about the way his system was patched. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Pro Audio
Junior Varsity
Why is mixing considered...
Top
Bottom
Sign-up
or
log in
to join the discussion today!