The rise and fall of outline GTO as well as the rise and fall of d@nley.
One house to ask the question, why is one loudspeaker more popular than the other. To use my lessons learned from a previous sales rep who worked for a company who I will not mention. Unfortunately, the gentleman exited planet earth a little early.The gentleman shared with me, the secret to doing demos with line arrays. The trick is, whoever did the demo last wins the job.
The problem Italy had was the Italy. It was first to create specific technology. Along with the French, the first was lacoustics. The second was nexo in outline. Nexo and outline created a patent war over the dual parabolic phase plug, in which case nobody won and there. The industry didn't recognize either company and made fun of them in marketing.
The Germans have been amazing with their efficiency and continue the work of Alexander Hertz, in which case the Germans use The Beatles and put them on a treadmill, making them perfect without the Germans. The Beatles wouldn't exist. The Beatles had good music in England. But because of the reprocity or repetition they got good. Same for me, with designing sound systems using German. Software, I did the same thing over and over and eventually got good. The Germans showed app several decades ago, with venture capitalist money and properly funded the invention of the J8, the J8 loudspeaker, was fantastic and was an amazingly good successful product. However, the follow-up was not so successful in my opinion. Acoustically, speaking. Financially speaking very successful.
The benefit of one loudspeaker over another for touring purposes was supposed to be weight of the loudspeakers. I'm familiar with weight saving in the installation world. We used to save a fortune by using ceiling loudspeakers with a higher sensitivity, which meant lower wattage amplifiers, which cost less money and required less real.Estate space in the equipment racks.
The same is true for a manifold corn. Loaded loudspeaker in short from the days of all tech lansing, a manifold loudspeaker includes using multiple drivers, typically, two drivers sharing one coentrant input to a horn. There are two benefits and only 2. First, the , max s p l goes up three d b, second the sensitivity goes up 6 dB. Why does that matter? Well, you can use a 10000 kW amplifier, which has a current rating of X and achieve the same S. P l level as a twenty kilowatt amplifier, which has a current draw of x. Yes, there are benefits of harmonic distortion. Yes, Dave rat pioneered and convinced the rhcp band to tour with 2 liner rays. And yes, we can debate this till the cows come home. However, the matter of fact is, there's more than one benefit besides the two mentioned for manifold technology.
The simple fact is the relationships between the largest manufacturers such as Meyer, Adamson, dnb. La acoustics outline, nexo, danley, have nothing to do with me. I'm not a tour professional once upon a time. I had dreams of flying Claire. S four rigs and showco a prism rigs from regal row however, I chickened out and took a comfortable gig. Mixing a symphony and later, sitting at a desk in air conditioning or heating designing systems using three d models, in which case at the time.The tour industry did not use three d models.
Now, elacoustics gets credit for many, many, many things. Does it make him better? It just means that they get credit for doing lots of really good things such as creating a dealer network, a rental network consistency, and providing 3D models of stadiums and arenas for their prediction program. In which case was slightly more accurate by a quarter d b then the other prediction programs.
The lacoustics speakers loudspeakers, just sound better, meaning they're not as aggressive as the other counterparts. They don't throw as far they're not as accurate but they do sound better. It's not that they couldn't have designed a dual parabola.It's that they made decisions in my opinion to modify the dual parabola, in which case it sounded better.
Maybe the bumper bars weren't as good. Maybe the subwoofers weren't as good, maybe the support was different. Maybe IA lot of things, but in short, things are the way things are and La acoustiques has thousands of installations. In which case all they have to do economically? Is replace their old systems with new systems, much like taking an iron to a shirt and fixing the wrinkles. Was there a benefit? In addition, with the new loudspeakers, not that makes me interested. If I had a pre-existing French sound system, will I be interested absolutely? And with that I wish them luck.
Regarding outline, they are simply more accurate and more precise end of story. However, people did not want that they wanted marketing. They wanted numbers, they wanted relationships, and that has nothing to do with italy. In italy, the product is the product end of story. The bumper bar from Italy was too big too big. They said, that's disgusting. It was the perfect size and the only line array to have a point 25° angle, in which case throwing sound past 300 feet requires. In my opinion, a quarter degree of accuracy. Not precision accuracy. Actually, I said that backwards, as I always do, but you get the point, and if you don't know the difference between precision and accuracy, you don't belong hanging line arrays, above people's heads.
The problem the n b a had with the l acoustics, rigging, it's none of my concern. I was at the installer or the consultant, but it is a problem for l acoustics.
,,,,,
.
One house to ask the question, why is one loudspeaker more popular than the other. To use my lessons learned from a previous sales rep who worked for a company who I will not mention. Unfortunately, the gentleman exited planet earth a little early.The gentleman shared with me, the secret to doing demos with line arrays. The trick is, whoever did the demo last wins the job.
The problem Italy had was the Italy. It was first to create specific technology. Along with the French, the first was lacoustics. The second was nexo in outline. Nexo and outline created a patent war over the dual parabolic phase plug, in which case nobody won and there. The industry didn't recognize either company and made fun of them in marketing.
The Germans have been amazing with their efficiency and continue the work of Alexander Hertz, in which case the Germans use The Beatles and put them on a treadmill, making them perfect without the Germans. The Beatles wouldn't exist. The Beatles had good music in England. But because of the reprocity or repetition they got good. Same for me, with designing sound systems using German. Software, I did the same thing over and over and eventually got good. The Germans showed app several decades ago, with venture capitalist money and properly funded the invention of the J8, the J8 loudspeaker, was fantastic and was an amazingly good successful product. However, the follow-up was not so successful in my opinion. Acoustically, speaking. Financially speaking very successful.
The benefit of one loudspeaker over another for touring purposes was supposed to be weight of the loudspeakers. I'm familiar with weight saving in the installation world. We used to save a fortune by using ceiling loudspeakers with a higher sensitivity, which meant lower wattage amplifiers, which cost less money and required less real.Estate space in the equipment racks.
The same is true for a manifold corn. Loaded loudspeaker in short from the days of all tech lansing, a manifold loudspeaker includes using multiple drivers, typically, two drivers sharing one coentrant input to a horn. There are two benefits and only 2. First, the , max s p l goes up three d b, second the sensitivity goes up 6 dB. Why does that matter? Well, you can use a 10000 kW amplifier, which has a current rating of X and achieve the same S. P l level as a twenty kilowatt amplifier, which has a current draw of x. Yes, there are benefits of harmonic distortion. Yes, Dave rat pioneered and convinced the rhcp band to tour with 2 liner rays. And yes, we can debate this till the cows come home. However, the matter of fact is, there's more than one benefit besides the two mentioned for manifold technology.
The simple fact is the relationships between the largest manufacturers such as Meyer, Adamson, dnb. La acoustics outline, nexo, danley, have nothing to do with me. I'm not a tour professional once upon a time. I had dreams of flying Claire. S four rigs and showco a prism rigs from regal row however, I chickened out and took a comfortable gig. Mixing a symphony and later, sitting at a desk in air conditioning or heating designing systems using three d models, in which case at the time.The tour industry did not use three d models.
Now, elacoustics gets credit for many, many, many things. Does it make him better? It just means that they get credit for doing lots of really good things such as creating a dealer network, a rental network consistency, and providing 3D models of stadiums and arenas for their prediction program. In which case was slightly more accurate by a quarter d b then the other prediction programs.
The lacoustics speakers loudspeakers, just sound better, meaning they're not as aggressive as the other counterparts. They don't throw as far they're not as accurate but they do sound better. It's not that they couldn't have designed a dual parabola.It's that they made decisions in my opinion to modify the dual parabola, in which case it sounded better.
Maybe the bumper bars weren't as good. Maybe the subwoofers weren't as good, maybe the support was different. Maybe IA lot of things, but in short, things are the way things are and La acoustiques has thousands of installations. In which case all they have to do economically? Is replace their old systems with new systems, much like taking an iron to a shirt and fixing the wrinkles. Was there a benefit? In addition, with the new loudspeakers, not that makes me interested. If I had a pre-existing French sound system, will I be interested absolutely? And with that I wish them luck.
Regarding outline, they are simply more accurate and more precise end of story. However, people did not want that they wanted marketing. They wanted numbers, they wanted relationships, and that has nothing to do with italy. In italy, the product is the product end of story. The bumper bar from Italy was too big too big. They said, that's disgusting. It was the perfect size and the only line array to have a point 25° angle, in which case throwing sound past 300 feet requires. In my opinion, a quarter degree of accuracy. Not precision accuracy. Actually, I said that backwards, as I always do, but you get the point, and if you don't know the difference between precision and accuracy, you don't belong hanging line arrays, above people's heads.
The problem the n b a had with the l acoustics, rigging, it's none of my concern. I was at the installer or the consultant, but it is a problem for l acoustics.
,,,,,
.