Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="gordon mcgregor" data-source="post: 22586" data-attributes="member: 169">Re: Windoze tweeks for firewire audio recordingIf I use my computer for more than a few tracks or for a long recording rather than song by song I find that with all the Anti Whatever software off and wireless off, my very average laptop is quite happy with up to 32 tracks with the latency fairly high never tried it for more tracks recording, though it will mix down over 40 tracks again latency is high but that is it as far as adjustments are required. I still prefer a dedicated recorder but not to the point of refusing to use the laptop these days. I use REAPER as it seems to have the lowest CPU overhead as long as you don&#039;t go inserting loads of plug ins etc. I can play back 24 tracks 48k/24bit from my USB drive no problemas well just to add to the confusion <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> G</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gordon mcgregor, post: 22586, member: 169"] Re: Windoze tweeks for firewire audio recording If I use my computer for more than a few tracks or for a long recording rather than song by song I find that with all the Anti Whatever software off and wireless off, my very average laptop is quite happy with up to 32 tracks with the latency fairly high never tried it for more tracks recording, though it will mix down over 40 tracks again latency is high but that is it as far as adjustments are required. I still prefer a dedicated recorder but not to the point of refusing to use the laptop these days. I use REAPER as it seems to have the lowest CPU overhead as long as you don't go inserting loads of plug ins etc. I can play back 24 tracks 48k/24bit from my USB drive no problemas well just to add to the confusion :) G [/QUOTE]

Verification